Skip to content

Perceptions of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care Among Healthcare Professionals (MULTIPAL)

Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care: A Multicriteria Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey (MULTIPAL)

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07554209
Acronym
MULTIPAL
Enrollment
580
Registered
2026-04-28
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Decision Making, Health Services Research, Home Care, Hospital-Based, Palliative Care

Keywords

multicriteria decision analysis, Palliative care, Home-based palliative care, Healthcare professionals, Multidisciplinary team, Professional perceptions, Decision making, Priority setting, Quality of care, Health services research, Professional training

Brief summary

This observational cross-sectional study evaluates and compares healthcare professionals' perceptions of key domains of home-based palliative care. Using an anonymous online survey and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods, the study explores perceived importance, strategic prioritization, and self-assessed performance across five core palliative care domains. The study is conducted across Hospital-at-Home units throughout the Valencian Community (Spain).

Detailed description

MULTIPAL is an observational, analytical, cross-sectional census survey designed to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of home-based palliative care within Hospital-at-Home units. The study is grounded in international palliative care frameworks, including those promoted by the World Health Organization, which define palliative care as a multidimensional approach encompassing symptom control, psychosocial and spiritual care, communication, coordination, and professional well-being. Differences in professional priorities may influence clinical decision-making, coordination, and care quality. Despite increasing attention to palliative care quality indicators, professionals' perspectives-particularly in home-based settings-remain underexplored. The study applies complementary Multicriteria Decision Analysis methods (TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, Analytic Hierarchy Process) to evaluate and compare professional priorities across five predefined domains: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals. Initially conceived as a single-center study, MULTIPAL was expanded to all Hospital-at-Home units in the Valencian Community to enhance representativeness, external validity, and relevance for system-level quality improvement.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
Lead SponsorOTHER
Universitat Politècnica de València
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthcare professionals working in Hospital-at-Home units providing home-based palliative care within the Valencian Community.

Exclusion criteria

* Healthcare professionals without direct clinical or care-related responsibilities (e.g., administrative or non-clinical support staff) within Hospital-at-Home units.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. Multicriteria prioritization of home-based palliative care domains (TOPSIS)Baseline (single cross-sectional survey)Relative prioritization of five predefined domains of home-based palliative care based on healthcare professionals' perceived importance and performance (symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals) . Measure: TOPSIS closeness coefficient for each domain . Unit of Measure: Closeness coefficient (0-1). Measurement Tool / Method: Multicriteria Decision Analysis using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2. Preference-based ranking of palliative care domains (PROMETHEE)Baseline (single cross-sectional survey)Preference-based ranking of palliative care domains according to healthcare professionals' judgments: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals. Measure: Net preference flow for each domain. Unit of Measure: Net preference flow score. Measurement Tool / Method: Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE).
3. Hierarchical weighting and consistency of each domain importance (AHP)Baseline (single cross-sectional survey)Assessment of relative importance and internal consistency of professional judgments for the following domains: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals. Measure: Normalized priority weights and consistency ratio. Unit of Measure: Dimensionless. Measurement Tool / Method: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). At survey completion.
4. Interprofessional consensus on domain prioritizationBaseline (single cross-sectional survey)Degree of agreement between professional groups regarding domain priorities. Measure: Absolute difference in ranking positions. Unit of Measure: Rank difference. Measurement Tool / Method: Comparison of TOPSIS-derived rankings between groups. At survey completion.
5. Importance-performance gap in palliative care domainsBaseline (single cross-sectional survey)Difference between perceived importance and perceived performance for each domain. Measure: Importance-performance gap score. Unit of Measure: Likert-scale score difference. Measurement Tool / Method: Direct calculation from survey ratings.
Variation in domain prioritization by professional and experiential factorsBaseline (single cross-sectional survey)Exploratory differences in priorities according to professional role, experience, age, and gender. Measure: Differences in MCDA-derived scores. Unit of Measure: Method-specific. Measurement Tool / Method: Subgroup analyses using TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and AHP estimators.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVicente Ruiz Garcia

Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain

STUDY_CHAIRElisa Soriano Melchor, MD, PhD

Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain

STUDY_DIRECTORAlberto Muñoz Cano, MD, PhD

Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026