Skip to content

Clinic-Community Bridge to Improve Health Outcomes for Abused Women Living With HIV/AIDS

Clinic-Community Bridge-to-Care Initiative: Trauma and Violence Informed Care (TVIC) With Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Living With HIV/AIDS

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07553312
Acronym
Bridges
Enrollment
450
Registered
2026-04-28
Start date
2026-03-17
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Women Living With HIV/AIDS, Intimate Partner Violence

Keywords

Women's Health, HIV, Intimate Partner Violence, AIDS

Brief summary

Women living with HIV/AIDS (WLWHA) in Baltimore experience disproportionately high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV), housing instability, and food insecurity, which adversely affect health outcomes. The Bartlett Bridges study is being implemented in partnership with the John G. Bartlett Infectious Diseases Specialty Practice (Bartlett Clinic) located at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The Bartlett Clinic provides comprehensive, compassionate and equitable services for infectious disease prevention, diagnosis and care. The study team will adapt and evaluate a trauma and violence-informed care (TVIC) intervention, called Confidentiality, Universal Education and Empowerment and Support (CUES), enhanced with the evidence-based myPlan safety planning app in the Bartlett Clinic to address IPV, health and safety in partnership with community organizations that provide advocacy, housing and social services. This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial aims to improve HIV and mental health outcomes, increase safety, reduce health disparities, and identify implementation mechanisms to inform future scale-up and sustainability of the intervention in healthcare settings.

Detailed description

Objectives Aim 1: Using the ADAPT-ITT framework, the clinic-community partners will collaboratively adapt/design the CUES intervention enhanced with myPlan and connections to community organizations (CUES+) to meet the complex health and safety needs of abused WLWHA. The Hopkins team and members of the investigator's clinic-community advisory board (CAB) will collaborate to adapt and design the CUES+ intervention. Aim 2: Examine the effectiveness of the CUES+ intervention in reducing health disparities for abused WLWHA. All WLWHA clients will receive CUES+ through the clinic-community partnership. Primary outcomes (ART adherence, missed visits/proportion of visits missed, treatment adherence self-efficacy) and mental health (depression, PTSD) will be measured at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post baseline. The investigators hypothesize IPV(+) WLWHA will have poorer outcomes than IPV(-) WLWHA at baseline. After the CUES+ intervention, outcomes for IPV(+) WLWHA will approach the level of outcomes for IPV(-) WLWHA. Aim 3: Assess the mechanisms, facilitators, and barriers to implementation of clinic-community CUES+ intervention. Aim 3a: Mechanisms (e.g., safety behaviors/resources, IPV exposure, housing stability, food security) by which CUES+ intervention improves primary outcomes will be examined. The investigators hypothesize the intervention will increase safety behaviors and resources, housing stability and food security and reduce IPV exposure resulting in improvements in primary health outcomes. An understanding of mechanisms will identify clinic-community organizational culture, resources and policies needed to sustain the partnership. Aim 3b: Examine clinic-community-based partners contextual and program factors that facilitate the intervention and are needed to sustain the partnerships. The investigators will also examine barriers and facilitators to the intervention from the perspectives of clinicians and community-based partners to inform future implementation and scale-up.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Hopkins Bartlett Clinic patient * HIV/AIDS positive * Self-identify as female * Adult (18 years of age or older)

Exclusion criteria

* Not a Hopkins Bartlett Clinic patient * HIV/AIDS negative * Does not identify as female * Under age of 18 years of age * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression as assessed by the PROMIS Depression scaleBaseline, 6 and 12 months post baselinePROMIS Depression 8. Score range 0 to 32; higher score is worse
HIV-related viral load12 months post baselineObtained from Medical Record. Score range 0-\>100,000; higher scores are worse
PTSD Checklist (PCL-6)Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselinePCL-6 - 6 items. Score range: 0-24; higher score is worse
Retrospective HIV adherenceBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineRetrospective Adherence 5-items. Score range 0-15; higher score is worse
HIV Adherence Self-EfficacyBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineHIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale 13-items. Score range 0-39; higher score is better

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Behaviors surveyBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineSafety Behaviors survey adapted from previous studies. 28 items, Score range 0-28; higher is better.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) as assessed by the Composite Abuse ScaleBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineComposite Abuse Scale (CASr-SF). 15 items, Score range 0-75; higher is worse
Housing Stability as assessed by the Homelessness Screening Clinical ReminderBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineHomelessness Screening Clinical Reminder (HSCR). 10 items, Score range 0-10; higher score is worse
Food security as assessed by the Food Security in the US SurveyBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineUSDA measure. 8 items. score range: 0 to 16; higher score is worse
Housing Conditions as assessed by the Property Condition AssessmentBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineHUD definitions, Property Condition Assessment. 2 items, score range 0 to 8; higher score is worse
Suicide BehaviorBaseline, 6 and 12 months post-baselineIdeation and attempts. 2 items, score range 0-2; higher score is worse
Health and Well-being as assessed by the PROMIS Global Health ScaleBaseline, 6 and 12 months post baselinePROMIS Global Health Scale. 10 items, score range 4-20; higher score is better

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNancy Glass

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026