Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises With Idiopathic Scoliosis

Comparative Effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises Versus General Exercises in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07552662
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-04-27
Start date
2024-04-18
Completion date
2025-11-18
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Scoliosis Idiopathic, Exercise, Scroth

Keywords

Scoliosis Idiopathic, Cobb angle, quality of life

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises (PSSE-Schroth) compared with General Exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis over a 12-month intervention period. Primary outcomes include Cobb angle progression and brace prescription rate. Secondary outcomes include trunk rotation, quality of life, self-image, and body symmetry.

Detailed description

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity that may progress during growth. Although PSSE is increasingly recommended in conservative scoliosis management, comparative randomized evidence remains limited. This study aims to compare PSSE-Schroth exercises with General Exercises in adolescents with mild idiopathic scoliosis over 12 months. Participants are randomized into intervention or control groups receiving matched exercise dosage and supervision. Outcomes assess radiographic progression, trunk rotation, need for bracing, and patient-reported clinical parameters.

Interventions

OTHERPSSE-Schroth Exercises

Participants performed individualized PSSE-Schroth exercises based on curve pattern, including corrective breathing, postural correction, and ADL training

Participants performed general strengthening and stretching exercises without scoliosis-specific correction.

Sponsors

Hasan Kalyoncu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors and statisticians were blinded to group allocation. Participants and treating therapists were not blinded due to the nature of exercise interventions.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either PSSE-Schroth or General Exercise intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis * Cobb angle 10°-25° * Risser sign 0-3 ATR \>5° * Less than 1 year post-menarche (for females)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous brace treatment \* Non-idiopathic scoliosis * Previous scoliosis surgery * Neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cobb AngleBaseline to 12 MonthsCobb angle will be measured on standing anteroposterior spinal radiographs using the standard Cobb method. The angle is defined as the intersection of lines drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the upper-end vertebra and the inferior endplate of the lower-end vertebra of the primary curve. Measurements will be performed at baseline and after the intervention period, and the change in Cobb angle (in degrees) will be calculated. Lower values indicate an improvement in spinal curvature.
Brace Prescription Rate12 MonthsThe proportion of participants requiring orthotic bracing during the study period will be recorded. Brace prescription will be determined by a specialist according to established clinical criteria (e.g., curve magnitude, skeletal maturity, and risk of progression). The rate will be expressed as the percentage of participants prescribed a brace in each group during the follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SRS-22 Questionnaire ScoreBaseline to 12 MonthsHealth-related quality of life will be assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). This validated instrument includes five domains: function/activity, pain, self-image/appearance, mental health, and satisfaction with management. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. Assessments will be performed at baseline and after the intervention period, and changes in domain and total scores will be analyzed.
TAPS ScoreBaseline to 12 MonthsTrunk appearance will be assessed using the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS). This patient-reported outcome measure evaluates subjective perception of trunk deformity using a set of standardized drawings viewed from different perspectives. Each item is scored on a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived trunk appearance (less deformity). Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after the intervention period, and changes in TAPS scores will be analyzed.
TRACE ScoreBaseline to 12 MonthsClinical trunk deformity will be assessed using the Trunk Aesthetic Clinical Evaluation (TRACE) scale. This clinician-rated tool evaluates visible asymmetries of the shoulders, scapulae, waist, and hemithorax. Each domain is scored based on the severity of asymmetry, and a total score is calculated, with higher scores indicating greater aesthetic deformity. Assessments will be performed at baseline and after the intervention period, and changes in TRACE scores will be analyzed.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 28, 2026