Skip to content

Disease Activity Monitoring in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis Study

Disease Activity Monitoring in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07552636
Acronym
DiAcMo
Enrollment
175
Registered
2026-04-27
Start date
2026-05-06
Completion date
2029-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

Keywords

vascular ultrasonography, disease activity monitoring, giant cell arteritis, patient-reported outcome measures

Brief summary

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is a vasculitis of medium- and large-sized arteries in older adults that may lead to serious vascular complications, including permanent vision loss and aortic aneurysm formation. Glucocorticoids are effective, but relapse during tapering is common and poses a major clinical challenge, potentially contributing to prolonged glucocorticoid exposure. Symptoms are often nonspecific and conventional inflammatory markers lack sufficient reliability, particularly in patients treated with drugs targeting the interleukin-6 pathway. Thus, this project aims to evaluate different tools assisting disease activity monitoring and/or predict future relapses and higher treatment requirements. Up to 175 patients with GCA in remission will be enrolled to ensure that 144 participants complete 1 year of follow-up. Participants undergo vascular ultrasonography, including double-blinded assessment at suspected relapse, complete patient-reported outcome measures, and provide biobank blood samples.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Svendborg Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
CollaboratorOTHER
Vejle Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Horsens Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical GCA diagnosis established/confirmed by a rheumatologist and positive GCA imaging or biopsy at diagnosis \< 3 years. 2. Clinical remission at the time of inclusion, defined as * Having adhered for ≥ 8 weeks prior to inclusion to either (a) the planned tapering of glucocorticoid therapy, or (b) the planned glucocorticoid-sparing DMARD treatment (with or without glucocorticoids). * Absence of, or no worsening of, symptoms attributed to GCA in ≥ 8 weeks. * Normal CRP level (\< 10 mg/L) within 7 days before inclusion. 3. Current prednisolone dosage of ≥ 5 mg if glucocorticoid monotherapy. 4. A continuous tapering of monotherapy or combination therapy is planned. 5. Age \> 50 years. 6. Study participants must be able to speak and understand spoken and written Danish.

Exclusion criteria

1. Intra-articular, intravenous or intramuscular glucocorticoid ≤ 7 weeks prior to inclusion. 2. Study participants who are unable to complete online questionnaires cannot participate in the GCA-PRO component of the study. 3. Presence of cognitive impairment, including clinically significant dementia, that may interfere with the ability to provide informed consent or comply with study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of change in OGUS from inclusion to suspected relapseWithin 10 monthsSensitivity and specificity of change in OMERACT Ultrasonography GCA Score (OGUS) from inclusion to suspected relapse (Follow-up 1a) for relapse/non-relapse using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of vascular ultrasonography scores at suspected relapseWithin 10 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity of US scores (OMERACT Ultrasonography GCA Score and halo count) at suspected relapse (Follow-up 1) for relapse/non-relapse using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard.
Proportion of correctly classified relapse/non-relapse by vascular ultrasonography among participants with clinically uncertain relapseWithin 10 monthsProportion of correctly classified relapse/non-relapse by vascular ultrasonography among participants with clinically uncertain relapse (Follow-up 1a) using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard. Key secondary.
Predictive cut-off values of vascular ultrasonography scores at remission for relapse12 monthsThe predictive cut-off values of vascular ultrasonography scores (OGUS and halo count) at remission (inclusion) for relapse within 12 months of inclusion using Follow-up 2 as the reference standard. Key secondary.
Change in GCA-PRO scores from remission to relapseWithin 10 monthsChange in Giant Cell Arteritis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (GCA-PRO) scores from remission (inclusion) to relapse (Follow-up 1a) using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as reference standard. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL). Key secondary.
Sensitivity and specificity of vascular ultrasonography scores for relapse/non-relapse in subgroups defined by OMERACT ultrasonography morphologyWithin 10 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity of vascular ultrasonography scores for relapse/non-relapse in subgroups defined by OMERACT US morphology (normal, active vasculitis, chronic vasculitis, atherosclerotic) using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard.
Change in probability of relapse and non-relapse before and after vascular ultrasonographyWithin 10 monthsChange in probability of relapse and non-relapse before and after vascular ultrasonography using clinician-rated pre-test probability and ultrasonography likelihood ratios.
Time from suspected relapse to clinical conclusion in participants with clinically uncertain relapse that were correctly classified with vascular ultrasonography12 monthsThe time (potentially saved) from suspected relapse (Follow-up 1a) to clinical conclusion (relapse review) in participants with clinically uncertain relapse that were correctly classified with vascular ultrasonography compared to the reference standard (Follow-up 2).
Number of supplementary tests ordered at suspected relapse to clinical conclusion in participants with clinically uncertain relapses/non-relapse that were correctly classified by vascular ultrasonography12 monthsThe number of supplementary tests ordered at suspected relapse (Follow-up 1a) to clinical conclusion (relapse review) in participants with clinically uncertain relapses/non-relapse that were correctly classified by vascular ultrasonography using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard.
Time to relapse over 12 months in relation to vascular ultrasonography scores at inclusion12 monthsTime to relapse over 12 months evaluated in relation to vascular ultrasonography scores at inclusion (remission).
Change in GCA-PRO scores at relapse and 10 days after treatment escalation.Within 10 monthsChange in GCA-PRO scores at relapse and 10 days after treatment escalation. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).
Convergence of GCA-PRO scores with other surrogate markers of disease activity from remission to relapseWithin 10 monthsConvergence of GCA-PRO scores with, respectively, c-reactive protein levels, patient and physician global activity numeric rating scale scores, and vascular ultrasonography scores (halo count and OGUS) from remission (inclusion) to relapse (Follow-up 1a). The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).
Sensitivity and specificity of change in GCA-PRO scores from inclusion to suspected relapseWithin 10 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity of change in GCA-PRO scores from inclusion to suspected relapse (Follow-up 1a) for relapse/non-relapse using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).
Sensitivity and specificity of GCA-PRO scores at suspected relapseWithin 10 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity of GCA-PRO scores at suspected relapse (Follow-up 1a) for relapse/non-relapse using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).
Relapse within 12 months evaluated in relation to GCA-PRO scores at inclusion.12 monthsRelapse within 12 months evaluated in relation to GCA-PRO scores at inclusion. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).
Sensitivity and specificity of change in halo count from inclusion to suspected relapseWithin 10 monthsThe sensitivity and specificity of change in halo count from remission (inclusion) to Follow-up 1a for relapse/non-relapse using the reassessment at Follow-up 2 as the reference standard.
Time to relapse over 12 months evaluated in relation to GCA-PRO scores at inclusion.12 monthsTime to relapse over 12 months evaluated in relation to GCA-PRO scores at inclusion. The total score for the GCA-PRO ranges from 0 to 90, where 0 indicates no impact on HRQoL and 90 indicates high disease impact (poor HRQoL).

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

CONTACTMorten Hansen, Medical Doctor
mothas@rm.dk+45 20187463

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026