Skip to content

Dry Needling vs ESWT in Lateral Epicondylitis

Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07550322
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-24
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2027-01-15
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)

Keywords

Lateral epicondylitis, Dry needling, Ultrasound-guided dry needling, Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ESWT, Musculoskeletal ultrasound

Brief summary

This randomized single-blind controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided dry needling and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Sixty participants aged 18-65 years will be randomized into two groups. The dry needling group will receive ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration once weekly for five sessions, while the ESWT group will receive radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy once weekly for five sessions. All participants will be given a standardized home exercise program. Pain, function, grip strength, pressure pain threshold, quality of life, and ultrasonographic findings will be evaluated at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome is change in pain severity measured by Visual Analog Scale.

Detailed description

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial is designed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided dry needling and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Participants aged 18-65 years with symptoms lasting at least six weeks will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated block randomization with sealed opaque envelopes. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants and treating physicians will not be blinded; however, all clinical and ultrasonographic assessments will be performed by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation. Participants in the dry needling group will receive ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration targeting the pathologic area of the common extensor tendon. The procedure will be performed once weekly for five sessions. Participants in the ESWT group will receive radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy applied to the most tender point over the lateral epicondyle using standard treatment parameters. ESWT will also be administered once weekly for five sessions. All participants will receive a standardized home exercise program consisting of eccentric strengthening and stretching exercises for the wrist extensors. Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Outcome measures will include pain intensity, functional status, grip strength, pressure pain threshold, quality of life, and ultrasonographic tendon characteristics including grayscale and Power Doppler findings.

Interventions

Dry needling will be performed under ultrasound guidance targeting the tendinosis area of the common extensor tendon. The procedure will be applied once weekly for five sessions.

DEVICEExtracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy will be applied using standard parameters (10-15 Hz, 1.5-2.5 bar, 2000 pulses) once weekly for five sessions.

Sponsors

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessments, ultrasonographic evaluations, and statistical analyses will be performed by investigators blinded to treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

Two parallel groups will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided dry needling or extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Both groups will receive five treatment sessions and will be followed for six months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 65 years * Clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis * Symptoms persisting for at least 6 weeks * Pain over the lateral epicondyle aggravated by wrist extension or gripping activities * Positive provocative tests consistent with lateral epicondylitis (e.g., Cozen's test and/or Mill's test) * Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous surgery for lateral epicondylitis in the affected elbow * Corticosteroid injection, PRP injection, prolotherapy, mesotherapy, or ESWT to the affected elbow within the previous 6 months * Bilateral lateral epicondylitis requiring simultaneous treatment * Cervical radiculopathy or other neurologic disorders affecting the upper extremity * Inflammatory rheumatic disease * Elbow osteoarthritis or significant structural elbow pathology * Full-thickness tendon tear or other major tendon injury on imaging * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Active infection, skin lesion, or wound at the treatment site * Use of anticoagulant therapy or bleeding disorder * Inability to comply with follow-up assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale. Change from baseline to immediate post-treatment, upto 3 months, and upto 6 months will be analyzed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scoreBaseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).PRTEE questionnaire will be used to evaluate pain and functional disability in lateral epicondylitis.
Change in grip strengthBaseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Grip strength will be measured using a hand dynamometer in kilograms.
Change in pressure pain thresholdBaseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Pressure pain threshold will be measured using a handheld algometer over the lateral epicondyle.
Change in quality of life measured by SF-12Baseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-12 questionnaire.
Change in ultrasonographic tendon thicknessBaseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Common extensor tendon thickness will be measured using musculoskeletal ultrasound.
Change in Power Doppler neovascularization scoreBaseline (Week 0), end of treatment after 5 weekly sessions (Week 5), 12 weeks post-treatment (Week 17), and 24 weeks post-treatment (Week 29).Neovascularization will be evaluated using semi-quantitative Power Doppler scoring.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTBerna Gunay, MD
bernagunay@yahoo.com+90 535 413 3047

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 25, 2026