Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation of Preoperative Preparation Methods in Patients With Large Incisional Hernias

Comparative Evaluation of Different Preoperative Optimization Strategies in Patients With Large, Complex, and Giant Incisional Hernias

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07549113
Acronym
AWR-PREP
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-04-23
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2028-05-01
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia Repair, Ventral Hernia Repair

Keywords

Giant incisional hernia, Complex abdominal wall reconstruction, Botulinum toxin A, Progressive pneumoperitoneum, Preoperative optimization, Component separation, Hernia repair, Loss of domain, Ventral hernia surgery

Brief summary

Patients with large, complex, or giant incisional hernias often require advanced preoperative optimization to facilitate safe abdominal wall reconstruction and reduce postoperative complications. Several strategies are currently used in clinical practice, including botulinum toxin A injection, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, and their combination. However, the optimal differentiated approach based on hernia characteristics and abdominal wall tissue deficiency remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different preoperative preparation strategies in patients with large postoperative ventral hernias and loss of abdominal wall domain. Outcomes of patients receiving botulinum toxin A, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, combined preparation, or no specific preparation will be analyzed. The study will evaluate operative feasibility, ability to achieve fascial closure, postoperative complications, recurrence, and overall treatment outcomes.

Detailed description

Large and giant incisional hernias remain a major challenge in abdominal wall surgery. In patients with loss of domain, reduced abdominal cavity volume, lateral muscle retraction, and soft tissue deficiency, standard hernia repair may be associated with high tension closure, respiratory compromise, abdominal compartment syndrome, wound complications, and recurrence. Preoperative optimization techniques such as chemical component relaxation with botulinum toxin A and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum have been increasingly used to improve abdominal wall compliance and restore abdominal domain. Combined use of these methods may provide additional benefit in selected patients. The present prospective comparative study is designed to assess a differentiated treatment strategy in which the method of preoperative preparation is selected according to clinical and anatomical characteristics of the hernia defect. Participants will be allocated to one of the following groups: Botulinum toxin A Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum Combined botulinum toxin A plus pneumoperitoneum No specific preoperative preparation Primary and secondary outcomes may include technical feasibility of repair, need for component separation, successful fascial closure, perioperative morbidity, hospital stay, recurrence rate, and patient recovery. The results of this study may help optimize patient selection and develop evidence-based algorithms for management of complex abdominal wall defects.

Interventions

Preoperative injection of botulinum toxin A into the lateral abdominal wall musculature.

PROCEDUREProgressive Preoperative Pneumoperitoneum

Gradual insufflation of the peritoneal cavity before surgery.

PROCEDURECombined Preoperative Preparation

Combination of botulinum toxin A and progressive pneumoperitoneum.

OTHERStandard Preoperative Management

Routine preparation without specific optimization techniques.

Sponsors

State Budget Public Health Institution Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open-label study due to the nature of the interventions

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to one of four parallel groups according to predefined clinical and anatomical criteria: botulinum toxin A, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, combined preparation, or no specific preoperative preparation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * Patients with ventral incisional hernia requiring elective surgical repair * Large and/or complex hernia defects requiring preoperative preparation * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age under 18 years * Emergency surgery * Pregnancy * Contraindications to botulinum toxin A injection or progressive pneumoperitoneum * Severe uncontrolled comorbidities precluding surgery * Inability or refusal to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful Midline Fascial Closure RateIntraoperative assessmentProportion of patients in whom tension-free primary fascial closure is achieved during abdominal wall reconstruction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Complication Rate30 days after surgeryOverall postoperative morbidity including surgical and medical complications classified by Clavien-Dindo
Length of Hospital StayFrom operation to discharge (up to 30 days)
Hernia Recurrence Rate12 months after surgery
Need for Component Separation TechniqueIntraoperative assessment

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026