Skip to content

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Can Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation be Regarded as a Rational Therapeutic Option for Treating Parkinson's Disease ?

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07548801
Acronym
cTDCSinPD
Enrollment
25
Registered
2026-04-23
Start date
2025-09-24
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)

Keywords

Parkinson's disease, cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation, MDS-UPDRS, CCAS scale

Brief summary

Background & Rationale: Treatment options for Parkinson's Disease (PD) often face challenges due to the variety of clinical subtypes, differing individual responses, and disease progression. Given its portability, affordability, safety, and ease of use, cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) presents as a promising option for home-based treatment with medical telemonitoring in the near future. Study Procedures: Participants are invited to complete questionnaires regarding quality of life, anxiety and depression, and symptoms related to their PD. On the first day, they will be assessed using the Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III for motor impairment and the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome scale (CCAS) for cognitive impairment. Participants will then undergo an additional 8 days of at-home cTDCS stimulation. On the 10th day, they will be reassessed using the MDS-UPDRS III and CCAS. One month later, they will complete again the questionnaires regarding quality of life, anxiety, depression, and symptoms related to their PD. Objective: Consequently, the primary goal is to investigate the effectiveness of ctDCS in addressing both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD

Interventions

DEVICEcTDCS

anodal cTDCS

Sponsors

Université Libre de Bruxelles
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (fnrs)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

MDS-UPDRS III is recorded by a blinded neurologist CCAS is recorded by a blinded neuropsychologist

Intervention model description

Three months post-stimulation, patients will cross over to the other study group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with mild to moderate PD MDS-UPDRS part 1III or between 1 and 3 on Hoehn and Yahr score * Patients \> 18 years of agE * Patients who have signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * Patients ≤ 18 years of age * Presence of intracranial metallic hardware (e.g., vascular clips, orthopedic material) * Presence of an implanted electronic device (e.g., pacemaker, cochlear implants, deep brain stimulator) * History of epileptic seizures * Active or past neurological condition affecting upper limb control (e.g., stroke, degenerative disease, tumor, traumatic sequelae), or any neuromuscular (e.g., upper limb polyneuropathy, myopathy) or orthopedic condition impairing upper limb motor control * Subject unable to understand or perform the required motor tasks * Psychotropic polypharmacy (regular use of neuroleptics, anti-epileptics, benzodiazepines, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MDS-UPDRS (Unit on a scale)day 1 to day 10 (MDS-UPDRS III) day 1 to day 40 (MDS-UPDRS Part I, II and IV)MDS-UPDRS Part III MDS-UPDRS Part I, II and IV
CCAS (Unit on a scale)day 1 and day 10CCAS scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and tolerability of ctDCS (Unit on a scale)from day 1 to day 10participant-reported outcomes regarding the ease of self-administration and the presence of side effects are collected through a dedicated questionnaire.
Scale evaluation anxiety (Unit on a scale)day 1 and day 40anxiety as evaluated by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Scale evaluating depression (Unit on a scale)day 1 and day 40depression as evaluated by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 )
Quality of life (Unit on a scale)day 1 and day 40quality of life as evaluated by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026