Skip to content

Optimal Radiotherapy - Heel Spur Syndrome - Randomized Clinical Trial

Impact of Total Dose and Fractionation on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Heel Spur Syndrome: Optimal Radiotherapy - Heel Spur Syndrome (ORHEELS) Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07546240
Acronym
ORHEELS
Enrollment
366
Registered
2026-04-22
Start date
2026-03-23
Completion date
2030-03-22
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heel Spur Syndrome

Keywords

Heel spur, Plantar fasciitis, Low-dose radiotherapy, Anti-inflammatory radiotherapy

Brief summary

Heel Spur Syndrome (HSS), is a pathology characterized by chronic inflammation and degenerative changes that affect approximately 10% of adults. Although many patients respond to conservative care, about 30% experience persistent pain. Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) is a well-established European method with proven anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. The ORHEELS trial aims to assess whether a Polish standard dose of 6 Gy in 6 daily fractions (fx)(5 times/week) is not inferior to the treatment with total dose of 3 Gy / fx 0,5 Gy /fractionated twice weekly. The study is designed to assess the impact of intensity of treatment (daily (5 times / week) versus twice weekly fractionation) on clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to optimize the fractionation schedules for radiotherapy in the treatment of HSS, through a prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Poland. Purpose/Objective: * To evaluate whether the Polish standard dose (6 Gy) achieves non-inferior therapeutic effects compared to the current European Standard Dose (3 Gy). * To investigate whether daily fractionation is more effective than twice weekly fractionation in maintaining the desired immunomodulatory effect and avoiding a pro-inflammatory "rebound". * To minimize the risk of stochastic effects (secondary cancers) by halving the cumulative radiation dose.

Interventions

Total dose of 6 Gy (6 fractions of 1.0 Gy) administered 5 times per week

RADIATIONReduced fractioned dose

Total dose of 3 Gy (6 fractions of 0.5 Gy) administered 5 times a week.

RADIATIONReduced fractioned dose & Intensity

Total dose of 3 Gy (6 fractions of 0.5 Gy) administered 2 times per week

Sponsors

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The trial is designed as a 1:1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 40 years or older. * Clinically confirmed painful Heel Spur Syndrome (plantar fasciitis) persisting for at least 3 months * No effect from previous orthopaedic, physical, or analgesic treatments. * General performance status ZUBROD 0-3. * Exclusion of other local conditions. * Patient readiness for follow-up contact.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior radiotherapy for heel spur. * Local use of corticosteroids within 4 weeks before planned radiotherapy. * Previous trauma, surgery to the foot on the same side. * Systemic diseases (eg collagen vascular disease). * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Lack of written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-inferiority of reduced fraction dose radiotherapy of heel spur3 months after treatmentThe primary endpoint will be evaluated as the difference in treatment success rates between arms A and C and between arms B and C. Success of treatment will be defined as a ≥50% reduction in pain intensity measured using the VAS scale and assessed 3 months after the end of treatment using the Pannewitz-modified pain scale relative to the baseline. Analyses for the two equivalent non-inferiority comparisons (A vs. C and B vs. C) will be performed one-sided at a significance level of α = 0.0125 (after applying the Bonferroni correction), corresponding to 97.5% two-sided confidence intervals, assuming a success rate of 65% for all three treatment regimens and an acceptable non-inferiority margin of δ=0.2, expressed as a risk difference

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of effectiveness in pain relief3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatmentPain relief will be evaluated using: The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and The modified von Pannewitz pain scale.
Assessment of functional and gait improvementBefore and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatmentImprovement will be measured using the Rowe Score scale.
Reirradiation rateUp to 12 months after treatmentA comparison of the number of patients requiring reirradiation defined as the proportion of patients requiring a second course of radiotherapy within 12 months of initial treatment
Assessment of treatment safety and tolerabilityThroughout the observation periodThe skin toxicity evaluated according to the version 5 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Patients' reported Quality of LifeBefore and 6, 12 months after the treatmentEvaluation of the SF-36 questionnaires
Evaluation of inflammatory markersBefore treatment and 1 month after treatmentEvaluation of systemic inflammation (morphology, CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen, and TNF-α)
Assessment of treatment effectiveness3, 6 and 12, 24 months after treatmentThe assessment will be conducted in accordance with the definitions provided, depending on the size of the irradiated area and the duration of pain symptoms (less than or more than 6 months)

Countries

Poland

Contacts

CONTACTIwona Dębosz-Suwińska
iwona.debosz-suwinska@gliwice.nio.gov.pl+48232789148
CONTACTMateusz Gajek
mateusz.gajek@gliwice.nio.gov.pl+48322788063
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORIwona Dębosz-Suwińska

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026