Skip to content

Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Combined With Oocyte Cryopreservation Versus Oocyte Cryopreservation Alone

Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Combined With Oocyte Cryopreservation Versus Oocyte Cryopreservation Alone: an Observational Study in Oncology Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07546123
Enrollment
127
Registered
2026-04-22
Start date
2025-08-25
Completion date
2029-09-01
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fertility Preservation, Oncological Disease

Brief summary

Fertility preservation is a crucial aspect of care for oncological patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery, which can significantly reduce ovarian reserve and cause infertility or premature menopause. Among available techniques, oocyte cryopreservation is well-established with high survival rates but requires controlled ovarian stimulation and may not be suitable for prepubertal patients or those needing urgent cancer therapy. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation offers advantages by preserving a larger number of primordial follicles, can be performed anytime in the menstrual cycle regardless of age, and also helps restore ovarian endocrine function. Combining ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation may maximize fertility preservation by safeguarding more follicles and ensuring availability of mature oocytes. This study will collect data from two patient groups: Group 1: patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation (combined treatment) Group 2: patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation alone. Group assignment is based on planned gonadotoxic therapy and available time before treatment initiation, according to clinical practice. The study aims to compare the number of oocytes retrieved per ovarian stimulation cycle between the two groups, along with the oocyte retrieval rate (number of oocytes retrieved/number of aspirated follicles), number of mature oocytes (metaphase II), incidence of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome within 7 days post-retrieval, and correlations between serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone levels on trigger day and oocyte yield. Approximately 127 patients aged 18 to 46 will be consecutively enrolled at the UO Gynecology and Human Reproduction Pathophysiology, IRCCS AOUBO Policlinico di Sant'Orsola. This is a cross-sectional, single-center, observational study with both retrospective and prospective enrollment. The retrospective period considered is from January 1, 2022, to the study start date. The study duration is 4 years and 3 months.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 46 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with oncological disease eligible for potentially gonadotoxic therapy * BMI ≥ 17.5 kg/m² and ≤ 32 kg/m² * Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 46 years

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to one or more of the active substances used during ovarian stimulation treatment * Positive for HBV, HCV, HIV, or Treponema pallidum * Lack of oncological clearance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the number of oocytes retrieved per stimulation cycle in oncology patients undergoing fertility preservation before gonadotoxic therapy: ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation vs. oocyte cryopreservation alone2 hours after oocyte retrievalCount of oocytes retrieved

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the oocyte retrieval rate (number of oocytes retrieved / number of aspirated follicles) between the two previously described patient groups.2 hours after oocyte retrievalNumber of oocytes retrieved / number of aspirated follicles
To compare the number of mature oocytes retrieved (defined as the number of metaphase II oocytes) between the two groups.2 hours after oocyte retrievalCount of retrieved metaphase II oocytes
To compare the number of patients who develop moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (defined by presence of ascites, maximum ovarian diameter ≥ 8 cm, hematocrit ≥ 45%, symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension, or dyspneWithin 7 days after oocyte retrieval.Number of patients presenting with moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (defined by the presence of ascites, maximum ovarian diameter ≥ 8 cm, hematocrit ≥ 45%, symptoms including abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and dyspnea)
To assess whether increasing serum levels of estradiol (E2) (pg/mL) and luteinizing hormone (LH), measured on the day of ovulation trigger, correspond to a higher number of oocytes retrieved in the two previously described patient groups.2 hours after oocyte retrieval]Estradiol (E2) measured in pg/mL / number of oocytes retrieved
To compare the number of patients who develop hemoperitoneum and/or pelvic infections between the two groups.Within 7 days after oocyte retrievalDevelopment of hemoperitoneum and/or pelvic infections

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTDiego Raimondo, MD
die.raimondo@gmail.com+393290636618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026