Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis(UPFRONT)

Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Multicenter, Open-label, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07546097
Enrollment
46
Registered
2026-04-22
Start date
2026-03-23
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

acute severe ulcerative colitis, Upadacitinib, Corticosteroids, First-Line Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn comparative effectiveness and safety of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether upadacitinib can effectively induce remission in acute severe ulcerative colitis with an efficacy non-inferior to that of corticosteroids. 2. What adverse reactions may occur with upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis? Researchers will compare upadacitinib with corticosteroids to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis.Participants will: 1. Upadacitinib group: Upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then adjusted to 30 mg once daily. 2. Corticosteroid group: Methylprednisolone for injection 60 mg/day. If clinical response is achieved, switch to oral prednisone acetate tablets after 5 days (calculated at 0.75 mg/kg/day), followed by a weekly prednisone taper of 5 mg. When the dose is reduced to 20 mg, taper by 2.5 mg weekly until discontinued, with mesalazine 4 g/day as maintenance therapy. 3. Take drug Upadacitinib or Corticosteroid every day for 3 months 4. Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests 5. Record the patient's bowel movements and the presence of symptoms such as abdominal pain, while performing colonoscopy, ultrasound examination, and blood tests at the specified time points.

Interventions

DRUGUpadacitinib

Safety and efficacy of the drug

DRUGCorticosteroid

Safety and efficacy of the drug

Sponsors

Yongquan Shi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with ASUC * Aged 18 years or older. * No gender restriction.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of contraindications, allergy, or intolerance to upadacitinib or glucocorticoids. * Patients requiring immediate colectomy; diagnosis of Crohn's disease; confirmed intestinal infection; hemodynamic instability; clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection; current malignancy. * Presence of severe underlying systemic diseases involving the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, hematologic system, or other organ systems. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Unwilling to participate in the clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome MeasureThe primary outcome was assessed by the investigator between days 3 and 7, with patients recorded as clinical responders if they had the primary outcome on any day in this assessment window.clinical response by day 7 (defined as a reduction in Lichtiger score to \<10 points with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical response by day 14day 14Defined as mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, accompanied by a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
clinical remission by day 28, day 42, and day 90day 28, day 42, and day 90Total Mayo score ≤2 points and no individual subscore \>1 point.
Endoscopic response by day 90day 90A decrease in MES score of ≥1 point, or a decrease of ≥50% from baseline.
Endoscopic remission by day 90day 90MES score ≤1
Endoscopic+clinical responseday 90Partial Mayo score ≤1 and MES ≤1
Clinical +FcP remissionday 90Partial Mayo score ≤1 and FcP≤250mg/kg
Clinical +CRP remissionday 90Partial Mayo score ≤1 and CRP≤5mg/L
Histologic remissionday 90typically defined as the absence of signs of neutrophilic infiltration. The specific criterion is a score below 2B.0, i.e., no increased neutrophils in the lamina propria.
Histologic improvementday 90when assessing treatment efficacy, a score ≤ 3.1 (intraepithelial neutrophilic infiltration involving \< 50% of crypts) is used as the threshold for histologic improvement.
Adverse Reactionsday 90Adverse Reactions
IBDQ and fatigue questionnaire scoresday 0 and day 90IBDQ and fatigue questionnaire scores

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTYongquan Shi
von15991351319@163.com+8602984771535

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 16, 2026