Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla, Tooth Loss in the Anterior Maxilla
Conditions
Keywords
Neoss Dental Implants, Implant-Supported Prosthesis, Anterior Maxilla, Marginal Bone Loss, Aesthetic Outcome
Brief summary
This prospective study aims to evaluate 5-year clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of implant-supported crowns and bridges placed on Neoss implants (ProActive Straight and Tapered) in the anterior maxilla (region 13 - 23). The study is conducted at Brånemarkkliniken, Public Dental Service, Västra Götalandsregionen, Sweden. While the treatment involves established methods and CE-marked devices, long-term data for this specific indication are limited.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to conduct a 5-year follow-up of implant-supported crowns and bridges placed on Neoss implants (ProActive Straight and Tapered) in the anterior maxilla (region 13 - 23). This is a prospective, single-center clinical follow-up study evaluating implant-supported prosthetic restorations in the anterior maxilla. Eligible patients receiving crowns or bridges supported by Neoss implants (ProActive Straight and Tapered) will be followed for 5 years. The treatment is based on established methods and CE-marked devices routinely used in clinical practice. However, long-term data for this specific indication are limited, and prospective follow-up is considered to be of clinical relevance. Clinical, radiographic, digital, and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed at prosthetic delivery (baseline), and at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups. The study aims to evaluate the performance of Neoss implants (ProActive Straight and Tapered) as support for single crowns and bridges after 5 years, with respect to complications, function, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction.
Interventions
Participants will receive implant-supported crowns or bridges supported by Neoss dental implants (ProActive Straight and Tapered) placed in the anterior maxilla. Implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation will be performed according to standard clinical procedures using a commercially available CE-marked implant system. The implants serve as support for fixed prosthetic restorations, and participants will be followed for 5 years to evaluate clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Signed informed consent to participate in the study. Adults ≥18 years of age requiring an implant-supported crown or bridge in the anterior maxilla (region 13-23). No prior bone augmentation required at the implant site. The implant site must be free from signs of infection.
Exclusion criteria
Individuals under 18 years of age. Individuals unable to provide informed consent due to disease, mental disorder, impaired health status, or similar conditions. Presence of systemic or local disease/condition contraindicating implant treatment. Lack of availability for follow-up visits over the 5-year study period. Previous radiotherapy to the head, neck, or jaw region. Untreated or uncontrolled periodontitis and/or peri-implantitis. Use of immunosuppressive medication. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Severe alcohol and/or substance abuse.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Survival | Baseline, 1 year, and 5 years | Absence of implant loss during the study period. |
| Change in marginal bone level around implants | Baseline, 1 year, and 5 years | Change in marginal bone level around implants as assessed by radiographic evaluation using standardized, anonymized radiographs. Measurements will be performed by an independent examiner. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Peri-implant Soft Tissue Status and change | Baseline, 1 year, and 5 years | Clinical assessment and evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue conditions using intraoral scanning and digital comparison over time. |
| Individual Tooth-Related Pink Esthetic Score (PES) | Baseline, 1 year, and 5 years | Evaluation of the peri-implant soft tissue aesthetics using the Pink Esthetic Score at the individual tooth level based on standardized photographic assessment. |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes | Baseline, 1 year, and 5 years | Patient satisfaction and perceived function/aesthetics assessed using a Visual analogue scale for rating (1-10). |
| Incidence of Adverse Events | Throughout the 5-year study period | Incidence of adverse events, including but not limited to implant loss, marginal bone loss, infection, swelling, and soft tissue complications. |
Countries
Sweden
Contacts
Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Care Service, Region of Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Care Service, Region of Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden