Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Conditions
Keywords
Mild-to-Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Apnea-Hypopnea Index, Mandibular Excursion, George Gauge, Jaw Motion Analyser, Randomized Controlled Trial
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the isolated and combined effects of orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in adults with mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea. The main questions it aims to answer are whether OMT alone, CPAP alone, or combined OMT plus CPAP improves obstructive sleep apnea severity at Week 12, as measured by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and whether these interventions improve mandibular excursion. Researchers will compare 4 groups-sham plus standard of care, OMT plus standard of care, CPAP plus standard of care, and combined OMT plus CPAP plus standard of care-to assess differences in respiratory and anatomical-functional outcomes. Participants will be randomized to 1 of the 4 study arms. During the 12-week supervised intervention phase, participants will receive their assigned intervention together with standardized sleep-hygiene and lifestyle counseling. Assessments include sleep recording, mandibular excursion measurements, questionnaires on sleepiness and sleep quality, dento-occlusal and anthropometric measurements, and treatment adherence monitoring. After Week 12, participants will enter an observational follow-up phase through Week 52 to evaluate durability of treatment effects, treatment persistence, symptom recurrence, and clinically indicated treatment modifications.
Detailed description
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic disorder associated with substantial cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive morbidity. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the standard treatment, but adherence is often suboptimal, especially in patients with mild-to-moderate OSA. Orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) is a promising non-pharmacological approach that may improve upper-airway function and reduce disease severity. However, few randomized studies have compared OMT and CPAP within the same factorial design, and limited data are available regarding the relationship between mandibular excursion and improvement in OSA severity. OMPACT-OSA was developed to address these gaps in a Lebanese academic clinical setting. OMPACT-OSA is a randomized, controlled, four-arm parallel-group clinical trial with a 2 x 2 factorial treatment structure and 1:1:1:1 allocation. Randomization will be stratified by baseline OSA severity. Participants will be assigned to sham plus standard of care, OMT plus standard of care, CPAP plus standard of care, or combined OMT plus CPAP plus standard of care. Mandibular excursion assessors and polysomnography scorers will remain blinded to treatment allocation, although participants cannot be blinded to CPAP exposure. Sham follow-up visits are used to mimic the intensity of OMT follow-up and reduce performance bias. The trial includes a 12-week supervised intervention phase followed by a 40-week observational phase, for a total duration of 52 weeks. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of OMT alone, CPAP alone, and combined OMT plus CPAP on the severity of mild-to-moderate OSA at Week 12. The primary endpoint is apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at Week 12 assessed by sleep recording. The key secondary endpoint is change in mandibular excursion from baseline to Week 12. Additional outcomes will assess whether baseline mandibular excursion, Mallampati score, and baseline respiratory-event phenotype (including apnea index, hypopnea index, and hypopnea-predominant versus apnea-predominant OSA) predict response to OMT, sleep quality, dento-occlusal effects, anthropometric measures, therapeutic adherence, treatment persistence, nocturnal respiratory parameters, and safety and tolerability outcomes. Eligible participants are adults with mild-to-moderate OSA confirmed by Type I polysomnography, no previous treatment with CPAP or OMT, and sufficient protrusive excursion to allow study procedures. Participants with severe OSA or urgent need for CPAP, obesity hypoventilation syndrome or chronic ventilatory failure, unstable major cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes requiring treatment intensification, upper-airway neurological or ENT disease, craniofacial abnormalities, recent maxillofacial surgery, temporomandibular pain preventing exercises, active periodontitis, pregnancy, foreseeable non-adherence, or ongoing CPAP/OMT at inclusion will be excluded. The sham arm consists of placebo breathing sessions combined with standard of care. The OMT arm consists of a structured 12-week program with 3 sessions per day, each lasting approximately 8 minutes, together with adherence support. The CPAP arm consists of CPAP treatment over 12 weeks, with technical and adherence support. The combined arm receives both full OMT and CPAP concurrently. Standard of care is provided uniformly to all participants and includes standardized sleep-hygiene counseling and general non-pharmacological lifestyle recommendations. Participants will undergo baseline and follow-up assessments, including sleep studies, mandibular excursion measurements using the George Gauge and Jaw Motion Analyser, insomnia severity assessment with the ISI, review of medications affecting sleep or respiratory drive, focused evaluation of comorbid conditions likely to confound sleep-related symptoms, and Mallampati classification. Baseline polysomnography data, including apnea index, hypopnea index, and respiratory-event phenotype, will be extracted, alongside anthropometric and dento-occlusal evaluation and adherence monitoring. After Week 12, all participants enter observational follow-up through Week 52 to evaluate durability of treatment effects under real-world conditions, document treatment persistence and symptom recurrence, and prospectively record treatment resumption, crossovers, and other protocol-relevant therapeutic changes. The final planned sample size is 168 participants, corresponding to 42 participants per arm. The primary analysis population is the intention-to-treat population. The study will be analyzed primarily as a four-arm randomized trial with a factorial structure, with prespecified sensitivity and exploratory analyses. An independent monitoring committee will be established to help ensure participant safety, proper data collection, and compliance with study procedures.
Interventions
Placebo breathing sessions delivered with the same frequency of visits and reminders as the active orofacial myofunctional therapy arm.
Structured orofacial myofunctional therapy program delivered over 12 weeks, consisting of 3 sessions per day of approximately 8 minutes each. Participants assigned to OMT will receive a 30-minute training session delivered by a speech therapist, either face-to-face or via videoconference. Training includes exercise demonstration, guided practice, posture correction, and access to PDF handouts and instructional videos. Adherence will be monitored primarily using the Loop Habit Tracker application configured for 3 daily reminders; a paper logbook will be used when digital tracking is not feasible. Reinforcement messages will be sent every 48 hours, and a Day-30 videoconference will be conducted to review technique and troubleshoot barriers.
Participants assigned to CPAP will receive a Week-1 telephone call to confirm installation and resolve technical issues, and a Week-6 adherence support visit to optimize mask fit and encourage use. Device-derived adherence metrics will include mean nightly use, P90/P95 pressure, median pressure, and mask leak statistics.
Standardized sleep-hygiene counseling and general non-pharmacological lifestyle recommendations provided uniformly to all participants, including regular sleep-wake schedules, avoidance of alcohol and sedatives before bedtime, reduction of evening screen exposure, optimization of the sleep environment, and encouragement of healthy dietary habits and physical activity aimed at gradual weight control.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Mandibular excursion assessors and polysomnography scorers will remain blinded to treatment allocation. Participants cannot be blinded to CPAP exposure; however, sham follow-up visits will mimic the intensity of OMT follow-up to reduce performance bias.
Intervention model description
Randomized, controlled, four-arm parallel-group trial with a 2 × 2 factorial treatment structure comparing sham plus standard of care, OMT plus standard of care, CPAP plus standard of care, and combined OMT plus CPAP plus standard of care in adults with mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea; allocation 1:1:1:1, stratified by baseline OSA severity.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 years or older. * Mild-to-moderate OSA (AHI 5.0-29.9 events/hour) confirmed by Type I polysomnography. * Protrusive excursion of at least 5 mm measured with the George Gauge. * No previous treatment with CPAP or OMT. * Ability to perform oropharyngeal exercises. * Written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Severe obstructive sleep apnea (AHI 30 events/hour or higher) or urgent need for CPAP * Suspected or confirmed obesity hypoventilation syndrome, chronic ventilatory failure, or severe obesity associated with daytime hypercapnia or hypoxemia * Clinically significant insomnia, defined as an Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score \> 14 at screening. * Uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological conditions likely to substantially affect sleep quality or daytime symptoms independently of OSA (e.g., major depressive episode, severe anxiety disorder, chronic disabling migraine)., as judged by the investigator. * Current use of medications likely to affect sleep architecture, respiratory drive, or PAP tolerance, including chronic opioid therapy and other sedative medications judged incompatible with study participation. * Unstable or severe cardiovascular disease requiring priority standard management, including poorly controlled arrhythmia, nocturnal angina, decompensated heart failure, treatment-resistant hypertension, or recent acute coronary syndrome * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus requiring treatment intensification, for example - HbA1c greater than 10% and/or symptomatic hyperglycemia * Neurological or ear-nose-throat disease affecting the upper airway * Craniofacial abnormalities * Maxillofacial surgery within the previous 6 months * Temporomandibular pain preventing completion of exercises * Active periodontitis * Pregnancy * Foreseeable non-adherence to the intervention * Inability to use CPAP despite standard fitting and troubleshooting, or any contraindication to CPAP treatment. * Ongoing CPAP or OMT at inclusion
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) | Week 12 | AHI at week 12, adjusted for baseline AHI, assessed by overnight sleep recording and scored according to the prespecified study scoring criteria, expressed in events/hour. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Mandibular Excursion | Baseline and Week 12 | Change in mandibular excursion (mm) between baseline and Week 12, defined as the mean of 3 George Gauge measurements, expressed in millimeters (mm) |
| Change in Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) Over Follow-up | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Change in AHI from baseline to follow-up visits, assessed by sleep recording and scored according to the prespecified study scoring criteria; expressed in events/hour. |
| Change in Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Change in oxygen desaturation index from baseline, assessed by overnight sleep recording; expressed in events/hour. |
| Change in Oxygen Saturation Nadir (SpO2 nadir) | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Change in lowest overnight oxygen saturation from baseline, assessed by overnight sleep recording; expressed in percent (%). |
| Calibration of Type III Polygraphy-Derived AHI Against Type I Polysomnography-Derived AHI | Week 12 | In a prespecified 20% subsample of the study population, apnea-hypopnea index measured by Type III polygraphy will be compared with apnea-hypopnea index measured by Type I polysomnography using paired recordings obtained at the same assessment time point, in order to derive a calibration equation. This calibration will then be applied to Type III polygraphy-derived measurements in the remaining participants. AHI will be expressed in events/hour. |
| Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Adherence | Week 6, Week 12, Week 36, and Week 52 | Average nightly CPAP use recorded from device data; use categories (\<4 h/night, 4-6 h/night, \>6 h/night), expressed in hours/night. |
| Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy Adherence | Week 6, Week 12, Week 36, and Week 52 | Adherence to prescribed orofacial myofunctional therapy sessions; expressed as percent of prescribed sessions completed (%). |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale Total Score | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 36, and Week 52 | Daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Global Score | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 36, and Week 52 | Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality (PSQI). |
| Temporomandibular Pain Intensity | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Temporomandibular pain assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale; score range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain. |
| Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index Score | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Dento-occlusal dysfunction assessed using the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index. Total scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. |
| Helkimo Anamnestic Index Category | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Subjective temporomandibular symptoms assessed using the Helkimo Anamnestic Index; reported as categorical classification: Ai0 = no symptoms, AiI = mild symptoms, and AiII = severe symptoms. |
| Head-to-Head Comparison of Mandibular Excursion Measurements Using George Gauge and JMA Optic | Baseline and Week 12 | Head-to-head comparison of mandibular excursion measurements obtained with the George Gauge and the JMA Optic at the same assessment time point; between-device differences will be evaluated using paired measurements and expressed in millimeters (mm). |
| Change in Neck Circumference | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Change in neck circumference from baseline; expressed in millimeters (mm). |
| Change in Body Mass Index | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 52 | Change in body mass index from baseline; expressed in kg/m². |
| Proportion of Participants With CPAP Response at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | CPAP response is defined as a reduction of more than 50% in apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to Week 12. Exploratory analyses will assess the association of baseline clinical variables, including sex and body mass index, with treatment response. |
| Association Between Baseline Mallampati Score and OMT Response | Baseline and Week 12 | Association between baseline Mallampati score and response to orofacial myofunctional therapy; where treatment response is defined as a reduction greater than 50% in apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to Week 12, and the association will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. |
| Association Between Baseline OSA Event Phenotype and OMT Response | Baseline and Week 12 | Association between baseline obstructive sleep apnea event phenotype (hypopnea-predominant versus apnea-predominant) and response to orofacial myofunctional therapy, where treatment response is defined as a reduction greater than 50% in apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to Week 12, and the association will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. |
| Association Between Baseline Mandibular Excursion and OMT Response | Baseline and Week 12 | Association between baseline mandibular excursion and response to orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) at Week 12, where treatment response is defined as a reduction greater than 50% in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline to Week 12; mandibular excursion is expressed in millimeters (mm), and the association will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. |
Contacts
Hotel Dieu de France, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon