Cervical Spinal Cord Plasticity
Conditions
Keywords
cervical spinal cord, paired associative stimulation, motor evoked potential, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, manual dexterity, corticospinal, sensory afferent, SCAP, spinal cord associative plasticity
Brief summary
Associative plasticity has been used to promote functional recovery from conditions affecting movement. Prior work from the Carmel laboratory has shown that paired associative stimulation protocols timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord induce significantly larger upper limb motor responses than if timed to converge in the motor cortex. The goal of this prospective experimental study in typically developing adults is to test the effects of pairing sub-threshold hand motor cortical and median nerve stimulation targeted to induce plasticity in the cervical spinal cord, rather than in the motor cortex. Based on preliminary data, the investigators are performing a confirmatory study to test the physiological and behavioral effects of the paired brain and peripheral nerve protocol, called the SCAP-Nerve protocol. This study will first be conducted in typically developing adults to confirm the cervical spinal cord as the ideal target and verify the present stimulation parameters are sufficient to promote induction of associative plasticity of sensorimotor connections for manual dexterity. The outcomes from this study could then be translated to efficacy studies in people with spinal cord injury and cerebral palsy to promote clinically meaningful improvements in dexterity.
Detailed description
Associative plasticity has been used to promote functional recovery in patient populations, such as adults with spinal cord injuries (SCI). Using non-invasive neuromodulation approaches, pairing of motor cortical stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation has been shown to augment motor responses and promote plasticity, primarily through the convergence of sensory afferent stimuli and descending cortical stimuli in the motor cortex. However, prior work from the Carmel laboratory has shown that paired associative stimulation timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord induces significantly larger upper limb motor responses than if timed to converge in the motor cortex. While paired associative stimulation has shown promise for strengthening motor responses, it is unclear if plasticity from convergence of non-invasive stimuli in the spinal cord (termed spinal cord associative plasticity or SCAP) instead of the motor cortex can produce greater motor effects, and potentially greater promotion of movement recovery. The goal of this present study is to test the effects of pairing sub-threshold hand motor cortical and median nerve stimulation targeted to induce plasticity in the cervical spinal cord, rather than in the motor cortex. The investigators aim to fill a knowledge gap regarding the ideal target of non-invasive stimulation to maximize associative plasticity for upper limb movement recovery. The study hypothesis is that pairing low-intensity stimulation of the hand motor cortex with low-intensity median nerve stimulation will produce associative plasticity in the cervical spinal cord measured through augmentation of motor responses in upper limb muscles. Based on preliminary data, the investigators are performing a confirmatory study to test the physiological and behavioral effects of the paired brain and peripheral nerve protocol, called the SCAP-Nerve protocol. This protocol uses a specific set of TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) and PNS (peripheral nerve stimulation) parameters: targeting hand motor cortex at 90% resting motor threshold and targeting median nerve sensory afferents (with a nerve stimulus pulse duration of 1000 microseconds) at 90% resting motor threshold, precisely timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord. This study will first be conducted with a single session of 90 trials of pairing in typically developing adults to confirm the cervical spinal cord as the ideal target and verify the present stimulation parameters as sufficient to promote induction of associative plasticity of sensorimotor connections for manual dexterity. Prior work from the Carmel laboratory has shown that the magnitude and duration of lasting effects of paired motor cortex and afferent stimulation is similar in rodents with and without neural injury. This then drives the premise for this study that the identification of the cervical spinal cord as an ideal target for associative plasticity involving cortical and sensory afferents would inform translation to people suffering from neurological injuries such as spinal cord injury and cerebral palsy. The outcomes from this study could be translated to efficacy studies in these patient populations to determine if this plasticity is present in those populations as well. This could then lead to the investigation of whether pairing brain and afferent-targeted nerve stimulation for convergence in the cervical spinal cord can lead to clinically meaningful improvements in manual dexterity.
Interventions
This utilizes pairing of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS) timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord.
This stimulator will be use to provide repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).
This stimulator will be used to provide repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS).
This utilizes pairing of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS) timed to arrive at a pairing interval of 40 msec.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
All participants will undergo all arms of the study. They will first receive the SCAP protocol, which is the source of the primary investigation in this study. Then, they will receive the three comparator arms in randomized order over multiple sessions timed at least 24 hours apart to minimize carryover effects.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Willingness to participate in up to 4 sessions * Maintenance of caffeine and exercise levels at time of sessions * Ability to provide informed consent * No known central or peripheral neurological disease or injury * No known musculoskeletal injury of the tested arm or hand
Exclusion criteria
* Personal or family history of seizures * Use of medications that lower seizure threshold * History of implanted equipment including stimulators/pacemakers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Size of muscle response to brain stimulation after SCAP (percentage) | 30 minutes after SCAP | Size of muscle response will be measured in response to brain stimulation. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Size of muscle response to nerve stimulation during combined brain and nerve stimulation after SCAP (percentage) | Immediately after intervention, up to 1 minute | Size of muscle response will be measured in response to brain and median nerve stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol. |
| Size of muscle response to nerve stimulation during combined brain and nerve stimulation (percentage) | Immediately after intervention, up to 1 minute | Size of muscle response will be measured in response to brain and median nerve stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the muscle response for nerve only stimulation. |
| Duration of effect of SCAP on subsequent responses to brain stimulation | 30 minutes after SCAP | Time in minutes taken for the size of muscle response to fall to 50% of its maximal post-SCAP level. |
| Pinch force variability | 30 minutes after SCAP | The coefficient of variation of the pinch opposition strength between the tips of the thumb and the second finger using a handheld dynamometer. This will be recorded and compared to baseline measurements. |
| Pinch force speed | 30 minutes after SCAP | The rate of force development of the pinch opposition strength between the tips of the thumb and the second finger using a handheld dynamometer. This will be recorded and compared to baseline measurements. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Columbia University