Skip to content

Effect of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum LM1001 on Muscle Strength in Older Adults

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum LM1001 on Muscle Strength in Older Adults.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07538830
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
2026-01-27
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-Related Muscle Weakness

Keywords

probiotics, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Age-related muscle weakness, Gut-muscle axis

Brief summary

Purpose: This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LM1001 in improving muscle strength in older adults. The study is designed to investigate its potential effects on muscle strength based on the gut-muscle axis. Methodology: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical trial. A total of 100 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the test group (n=50) or the placebo group (n=50). Participants in the test group will receive 500 mg of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LM1001 (1.0 × 10¹⁰ CFU/day) once daily for 12 weeks, while those in the placebo group will receive a matching placebo. Key Outcome Measures: To evaluate the effects on muscle strength, the following parameters will be assessed at baseline and after the 12-week intervention period: \- Primary Outcome Measures: Changes in isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength. \- Secondary Outcome Measures: Changes in muscle strength-related parameters, including muscle power, skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), as well as physical performance measures such as handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L. \- Safety Assessments: Safety will be evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events, serum biochemical parameters, and clinical laboratory test results.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLactiplantibacillus plantarum LM1001

A 500 mg capsule containing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LM1001 (1.0 x 10\^10 CFU/day).

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

An identical-looking 500 mg capsule containing inactive ingredients such as processed starch, maltodextrin, and magnesium stearate.

Sponsors

Lactomason Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants, care provider, investigators, and outcome assessors are blinded to the group allocation. The investigational product and placebo are identical in appearance, taste, and packaging.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to either the probiotic group or the placebo group and receive the assigned intervention for 12 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 50 to 84 years (male or female) * Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m² * Reduced skeletal muscle mass (≤110% of standard value by BIA) * Decreased handgrip strength according to age- and sex-specific criteria * Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score over 9 * Able to perform normal physical activity and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant acute or chronic diseases requiring treatment * Conditions affecting muscle function or physical performance (e.g., severe musculoskeletal, neurological, or cognitive disorders, including sarcopenia) * Significant gastrointestinal disorders or history of major gastrointestinal surgery * Severe psychiatric disorders or recent use of antipsychotic medications * Respiratory diseases affecting lung function * Excessive alcohol intake, substance abuse, or heavy smoking * Known hypersensitivity to the investigational product or its components * Recent use of medications or supplements affecting muscle function or gut microbiota (e.g., antibiotics, probiotics, steroids) * Regular high-intensity or resistance exercise * Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings or uncontrolled medical conditions * Recent fractures within the past year * Participation in another clinical trial within 3 months prior to screening * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Individuals unable to communicate or ambulate * Any other condition deemed unsuitable by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength (left and right)Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength (left and right), measured using Biodex at an angular velocity of 60°/s.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Muscle powerBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Muscle power measured by Biodex at an angular velocity of 60°/s
Change in Absolute skeletal muscle mass (SM)Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Absolute skeletal muscle mass (SM) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
Change in Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASM/height²)Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASM/height²) measured by BIA
Change in Total body fat percentageBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Total body fat percentage measured by BIA
Change in ASM/weight × 100Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in ASM/weight × 100 measured by BIA
Change in Skeletal muscle mass index (SMM/height²)Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Skeletal muscle mass index (SMM/height²) measured by BIA
Change in Handgrip strengthBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Handgrip strength measured by hand dynamometer
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scoreBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total score (range 0-12; higher scores indicate better physical performance) and subscores: balance (0-4), gait speed (0-4), and chair stand (0-4)
Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) testBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in functional mobility based on the time taken to stand, walk, turn, and return to a seated position.
Change in Serum creatinine levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum creatinine concentration
Change in Serum total protein levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum total protein concentration
Change in Serum albumin levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum albumin concentration
Change in Serum prealbumin levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum prealbumin concentration
Change in Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration
Change in Serum creatine kinase (CK) levelsBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration
Change in Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5LBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) index score (range -0.5 to 1.0; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life)

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

CONTACTYoon Ju So
yjso@lactomason.com+82-2-2677-0073
CONTACTEunju Lim
lit5540@naver.com+82-55-360-5988
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMyung Jun Shin, Ph.D.

Pusan National University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 28, 2026