Skip to content

Enhancing Health in Rural Populations: Music as Therapy

Enhancing Health in Rural Populations: Music as Therapy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07538427
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-20
Start date
2026-03-12
Completion date
2027-05-30
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Depression Disorder, Generalized Anxiety, Stress

Keywords

Music-based intervention, Active music therapy, Drumming, Non-pharmacological intervention, behavioral therapy, Aging populations, Community-based intervention

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a music-based intervention can improve mental and physical health and strengthen coping skills among adults living in residential care settings in northern Arizona. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does participation in the music-based intervention reduce stress, anxiety, depression, and pain?, and Does participation increase the use of music as a coping strategy and improve overall well-being? Researchers will compare participants' pre-intervention and post-intervention responses to determine whether the music classes are associated with improvements in health and coping outcomes. Participants will: Attend a 6-week music class held once per week for one hour; participate in active music activities such as drumming and rhythm exercises; complete a brief survey before and after the intervention. Some participants are also invited to complete a short interview about their experiences.

Detailed description

Approximately one in five adults in Arizona report symptoms of mental health disorders each year. These outcomes have been particularly challenging in rural and medically underserved areas, where long-term care residents face elevated risks of chronic stress, cognitive decline, and social isolation. Older adults with memory-related impairments are especially vulnerable to the loss of meaningful interpersonal and sensory engagement. Music-based interventions (MBIs) have demonstrated strong potential to support both cognitive and emotional well-being. Active music-making may improve physical symptoms (e.g., chronic pain) and reduce mental health symptoms (e.g., anxiety, stress, depression). However, there is limited research examining how familiarity, personalization, and continuity of musical exposure influence intervention outcomes among older adults. Older adults with cognitive impairment-particularly those living in long-term care-often experience reduced autonomy, fragmented social networks, and limited access to non-pharmacological therapies that support holistic well-being. This project responds to that gap by assessing how a structured MBI can engage older adults with varying levels of cognitive function. The proposed research will inform feasible, ethically grounded strategies for delivering a 6-week music-based intervention in ways that are meaningful, safe, and responsive to the needs of aging populations. Our central hypothesis is that participation in the MBI will improve stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, reduce chronic pain, and increase coping skills to manage health conditions among all participants.

Interventions

Participants will engage in a 6-week culturally grounded music-based intervention consisting of one 60-minute session per week. Sessions include active music participation such as drumming, rhythm exercises, and Indigenous music practices designed to improve stress, anxiety, depression, pain, and coping outcomes among adults in residential care settings.

Sponsors

Northern Arizona University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* residency at one of the two elder care facilities * ability to communicate in English.

Exclusion criteria

* not a resident at one of the two elder care facilities * inability to communicate in English.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. The tool, while originally developed in 1983, remains a popular choice for helping us understand how different situations affect our feelings and our perceived stress. The questions in this scale ask about feelings and thoughts during the last month. PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2)From enrollment to 6 weeks (post-intervention)The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) is an ultra-brief, 2-question screening tool used in primary care to detect generalized anxiety disorder. The total score range for the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) screening tool is 0 to 6, with a score of 3 or higher identifying possible cases of generalized anxiety disorder (and other common anxiety disorders).
Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)From enrollment to 6 weeks (post-intervention).The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) is a brief, two-question screening tool used to assess depression by measuring the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks with a total score ranging from 0 to 6. It assesses the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks, with a cut-point of 3 or greater often indicating a need for further evaluation.
Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS)From enrollment to 6 weeks (end of intervention)The purpose of the Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS) was to give doctors a standard with which to work when comparing pain and health. The CPGS classifies pain severity into five hierarchical categories-Grade 0 to Grade IV-based on pain intensity and disability over the past 3-6 months. It typically uses 0-10 Likert scales for individual items, calculating subscores for intensity and disability (0-100) to determine the grade. Higher scores indicate higher intensity and disability related to pain.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAriel L Roddy, PhD
ariel.roddy@nau.edu248 298 6978

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026