Skip to content

Crisaborole vs Fluticasone Propionate in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Comparative Study Between Topical Crisaborole 2% and Topical Fluticasone Propionate 0.05% in Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07537751
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-17
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema

Keywords

Atopic dermatitis, Eczema, Crisaborole, Fluticasone propionate, Topical corticosteroid, PDE4 inhibitor, Pediatric eczema

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind trial compared topical crisaborole 2% with topical fluticasone propionate 0.05% in children aged 1-12 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Forty patients were assigned to receive either crisaborole or fluticasone twice daily on affected areas for 6 weeks, with responders (\>75% improvement in SCORAD) continuing the same treatment twice weekly for 12 weeks as maintenance. The study evaluated improvement in disease severity using SCORAD and ISGA, pruritus scores, disease-free survival, and local tolerability. Both treatments were effective and well tolerated; fluticasone produced faster short-term improvement, while crisaborole showed a trend toward fewer relapses and similar overall safety in this pediatric population.

Detailed description

This single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled study enrolled 40 children with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, defined by Hanifin and Rajka criteria, ISGA 2-3, and objective SCORAD up to 40. Participants were randomized to topical crisaborole 2% or fluticasone propionate 0.05%, applied twice daily for 6 weeks, with eligible responders continuing twice-weekly maintenance for 12 weeks. Outcomes included percentage improvement in SCORAD at Week 6, changes in ISGA and pruritus, disease-free survival, and local adverse events such as burning or redness. Both regimens improved disease severity with acceptable safety; fluticasone had greater early SCORAD improvement, while crisaborole showed numerically higher disease-free survival and lower relapse rates during follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGCrisaborole 2% topical ointment

Crisaborole 2% topical ointment applied in a thin layer to all affected atopic dermatitis lesions twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by twice-weekly application for 12 weeks as maintenance in patients who achieve more than 75% improvement in SCORAD at Week 6.

DRUGFluticasone propionate 0.05% topical cream

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% topical cream applied in a thin layer to all affected atopic dermatitis lesions twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by twice-weekly application for 12 weeks as maintenance in patients who achieve more than 75% improvement in SCORAD at Week 6.

Sponsors

Noura Abdelmoneim Mohammed Elseessy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children of either sex aged 1 to 12 years. * Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis based on Hanifin and Rajka criteria. * Mild to moderate disease with objective SCORAD up to 40. * Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate) at baseline.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of systemic corticosteroids, nonsteroidal systemic immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine, methotrexate), or phototherapy within 4 weeks before baseline. * Use of topical corticosteroids, transdermal corticosteroids, topical antibiotics, or any medicated topical agent within 1 week before baseline. * Severe atopic dermatitis (objective SCORAD \> 40). * Significant medical condition requiring systemic medication (e.g., cancer). * Current clinical diagnosis of bacterial skin infection (such as abscess or impetigo).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage improvement in objective SCORAD from baseline to Week 6Baseline to Week 6 of treatmentObjective SCORAD is assessed at baseline and Week 6, and the percentage improvement is calculated as the change from baseline divided by the baseline score, expressed as a percentage, to compare treatment response between the two groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA)Baseline to Week 6ISGA score (0-4) is assessed at baseline and Week 6 to evaluate global clinical severity and response to treatment in each arm.
Change in peak pruritus numerical rating scaleBaseline to Week 18Peak pruritus is measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = no itch, 10 = worst imaginable itch) completed by patients or their parents at baseline, Week 6, and during follow-up.
Disease-free survival (relapse-free rate)Week 6 to Week 18Among patients achieving \>75% improvement in SCORAD at Week 6, the proportion remaining free of relapse (no increase in SCORAD \>50% over the Week 6 value) is assessed using survival analysis during the 12-week follow-up.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 18, 2026