Skip to content

PEEP Strategies and Mechanical Power in Robotic Surgery

Comparison of Incremental, Decremental, and Fixed PEEP Strategies on Mechanical Power and Postoperative Oxygenation in Robotic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07536464
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-04-17
Start date
2026-04-15
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2026-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impaired Oxygenation, Mechanical Ventilation, Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Brief summary

Robotic surgery requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning, which significantly impair respiratory mechanics and increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key determinant of lung recruitment; however, fixed PEEP strategies may not be optimal for all patients. Individualized PEEP titration strategies, including incremental and decremental approaches, may better optimize lung mechanics. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of incremental, decremental, and fixed PEEP strategies on cumulative mechanical power (MP-AUC) and postoperative oxygenation in patients undergoing robotic surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFixed PEEP Ventilation

Patients receive mechanical ventilation with a constant positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O throughout the surgical procedure.

PROCEDUREDecremental PEEP Strategy

PEEP is gradually decreased from a higher level to determine the optimal PEEP associated with the lowest driving pressure or lowest mechanical power, and this level is maintained during surgery.

PROCEDUREIncremental PEEP Strategy

PEEP is gradually increased from a lower level to identify the optimal PEEP corresponding to the lowest driving pressure or mechanical power, and this level is maintained during surgery.

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>= 18 * ASA I-III * Elective robotic surgery

Exclusion criteria

* COPD GOLD ≥2 * Restrictive lung disease * BMI \>40 kg/m² * Heart failure * Preoperative oxygen requirement * Need for postoperative mechanical ventilation * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Mechanical Power (MP-AUC)During surgery (from intubation to extubation)Total energy delivered to the respiratory system during surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratioIntraoperative period and postoperative period (within 2 hours)
Oxygenation Index (OSI)Postoperative 2 hours
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPC)Within 7 postoperative days

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 18, 2026