Skip to content

OMT vs Exercise in TMD

Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Versus Exercise on Pain, Function, and Dynamic Postural Control in Individuals With Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07534540
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2025-12-26
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Manipulation, Osteopathic, Exercise Therapy, Pain Measurement, Postural Balance

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether different rehabilitation approaches can improve pain, function, and postural control in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The study focuses on adults diagnosed with myogenic TMD. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in individuals with TMD? Does a structured home-based exercise program improve postural control and sensorimotor function in individuals with TMD? Researchers will compare osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and a home-based exercise program to determine their relative effects on pain, function, and postural stability. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to either the OMT group or the exercise group Receive the assigned intervention over the study period Undergo assessments before and after treatment, including pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, mandibular movements, cervical range of motion, postural stability, and quality of life

Detailed description

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are multifactorial conditions characterized by pain, functional limitations, and alterations in sensorimotor control. Although various rehabilitation approaches are commonly used in clinical practice, the relationship between TMD and postural stability remains unclear, particularly regarding the differential effects of specific treatment strategies. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and a structured home-based exercise program on pain, functional outcomes, and postural control in individuals with myogenic TMD. Participants diagnosed with myogenic TMD are randomly allocated to either an OMT group or a home-based exercise group. The OMT intervention consists of manual techniques targeting the temporomandibular joint and related musculoskeletal structures, while the exercise program includes structured therapeutic exercises designed to improve mobility, muscle function, and sensorimotor control. Outcome measures include pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold, mandibular movements, cervical range of motion (ROM), postural stability parameters, and quality of life. All assessments are performed before and after the intervention period by a blinded assessor. This study is designed to explore whether different rehabilitation approaches produce distinct effects on pain reduction, functional improvement, and postural control, thereby contributing to a better understanding of mechanism-based rehabilitation strategies in TMD.

Interventions

A structured home-based exercise program designed to improve mandibular mobility, cervical function, and sensorimotor control.

PROCEDUREOsteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)

A manual therapy intervention consisting of osteopathic manipulative techniques applied to the temporomandibular joint and related musculoskeletal structures. The treatment aims to reduce pain, improve joint mobility, and enhance functional outcomes.

Sponsors

Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study is designed as a randomized, parallel-group controlled trial comparing two intervention arms: osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and a structured home-based exercise program. Participants are randomly allocated to one of the two groups using a concealed randomization method. Outcome assessments are conducted by a blinded assessor before and after the intervention period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

TMD Group: * Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) confirmed by a dentist * Pain intensity ≥ 3.5 cm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) * Presence of TMD-related pain for at least 3 months * Aged between 18 and 50 years * Willingness to participate in the study Control Group: * No history or clinical signs of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) * Aged between 18 and 50 years * Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

TMD Group: * Presence of any condition other than TMD that may affect the assessment outcomes * Presence of musculoskeletal pain in any other body region * Any orthopedic or neurological condition that may interfere with assessments * Diagnosed psychiatric disorder * Conditions impairing communication or ability to complete assessments * Illiteracy * History of orthopedic surgery in any body region * Presence of systemic pathological conditions such as fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, or suspected malingering * Receipt of physiotherapy or other treatment targeting the temporomandibular joint or spinal region within the last 6 months Control Group: * History of chronic musculoskeletal disorders within the past year * Any orthopedic or neurological condition that may interfere with assessments * Diagnosed psychiatric disorder * Conditions impairing communication or ability to complete assessments * Illiteracy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)Before intervention and immediately after the intervention periodPain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Pain ThresholdBefore intervention and immediately after the intervention periodPressure pain threshold will be measured using a digital algometer applied to the anterior temporalis muscle, masseter muscle, and temporomandibular joint region. The average of three measurements will be recorded.
Mandibular Range of MotionBefore intervention and immediately after the intervention periodMandibular movements, including maximum mouth opening, lateral movements, and protrusion, will be measured in millimeters using a digital caliper.
Cervical Range of MotionBefore intervention and immediately after the intervention periodCervical range of motion will be assessed to evaluate neck mobility associated with temporomandibular function.
Postural StabilityBefore intervention and immediately after the intervention periodPostural stability will be assessed using the Lockhart Monitor mobile application during a 30-second static standing task, measuring mediolateral and anteroposterior sway.
Quality of Life (Short Form-12 Health Survey, SF-12)Before intervention and immediately after the intervention periodQuality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), a validated instrument that evaluates health-related quality of life across physical and mental domains. The SF-12 generates two composite scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Each component score is standardized and typically ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Scores are calculated using weighted algorithms based on population norms.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026