Skip to content

Effect of Different Volumes of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block Administered at Different Volumes on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07533760
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2022-06-01
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

his study aims to investigate the effects of different volumes of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. The researchers aim to determine whether varying the volume of local anesthetic in the ESPB can reduce the amount of morphine required by patients and improve pain scores during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREErector Spinae Plane Block

The ESPB will be performed at the T8-T9 vertebral levels. Patients will be placed in the prone position, and skin preparation will be performed with 10% povidone-iodine. Local anesthesia of the skin and subcutaneous tissue will be provided with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine at the target injection site. Under ultrasound guidance, a sterile-covered linear probe (8 MHz) will be used to visualize the T8 spinous process in the horizontal plane at the midline. The probe will then be rotated to the longitudinal plane, approximately 3 cm lateral to the midline, to visualize the transverse process and the overlying erector spinae muscle. A 22-gauge, 80-mm block needle will be advanced in-plane in a cranio-caudal direction until it contacts the transverse process. The needle was then withdrawn slightly, and its placement between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process was confirmed through hydrodissection. The patients in Group I received 20 ml of 0.25% (2.5 mg/ml) bupivacaine hydrochloride

Sponsors

Şule Arıcan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years. * Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III. * Patients scheduled to undergo elective total abdominal hysterectomy surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Obese patients (Body Mass Index \> 30 kg/m²). * Patients with local skin infection at the site of needle insertion. * Patients with a known allergy to any of the medications used in the study. * Patients with coagulopathy. * Patients with chronic opioid consumption. * Patients with an inability to use the Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device. * Patients with advanced hepatic or renal failure. * Patients who refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Morphine ConsumptionFirst 24 hours postoperativelyThe total amount of morphine (in milligrams) consumed by the patient via the Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for PainAt postoperative 30 minutes, 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th hoursPain intensity measured at rest and during movement (dynamic) using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Number of Blocked Dermatomes20 minutes after the block procedureThe number of dermatomes with loss of hot-cold sensation above and below the surgical incision.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORŞule Arıcan, Assoc. Prof.

Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHasan Çekdemir, specialist

Hadim State Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026