Skip to content

Effects of Instrument-Assisted Constant-Speed Injection Versus Manual Injection on Pain From Large-Volume Subcutaneous Injection of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Self-Controlled Study

Effects of Instrument-Assisted Constant-Speed Injection Versus Manual Injection on Pain From Large-Volume Subcutaneous Injection of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Self-Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07533526
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2026-10-30
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast cancer, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, Large volume subcutaneous injection, Instrument-driven constant-rate injection / manual injection, Pain

Brief summary

Research Background:Subcutaneous injection is an important route of administration in targeted therapy for breast cancer, but injection pain affects patients' treatment experience. Fluctuations in injection speed during traditional manual push may be one of the factors exacerbating pain, whereas machine-driven injection can provide a constant flow rate, theoretically reducing pain; however, high-quality evidence is lacking. Research Objective:To compare the difference in pain intensity between instrument constant-speed injection and manual injection in breast cancer patients receiving subcutaneous injection of pertuzumab and trastuzumab. Research Methods:A randomized self-controlled design is used, with data analysis performed using paired t-tests. The study plans to enroll 40 female breast cancer patients. Each patient receives two injection methods across two treatment cycles: instrument constant-speed injection (medical infusion pump, 2 mL/min) and manual injection (a nurse uses a stopwatch to time and simulates the injection pump speed of 2 mL/min). The order of injection methods is randomly assigned by drawing lots (the injection method for the first cycle is randomly drawn, and the method for the second cycle is naturally the alternative method). The primary outcome is the patient's most severe pain during injection, measured immediately after injection using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). Secondary outcomes include injection site reactions, patient satisfaction, nurse fatigue (Borg CR10 scale), patient preference, and safety indicators. Research Significance:The results of this study will provide high-level evidence for selecting comfortable and efficient subcutaneous injection techniques in clinical practice, thereby improving patients' treatment experience.

Interventions

OTHERInstrument-driven constant-rate injection

Drug preparation followed the standard procedure. A fixed team of two nurses, trained according to the study protocol, performed manual injection. The nurses, after training, simulated the speed of the machine injection and recorded the actual injection time using a stopwatch. During the injection, the number of patient-reported pain episodes, immediate pain scores, and the number of times the nurse interrupted the injection due to hand fatigue were recorded. The patient's blood pressure and pulse were recorded before, during, and after the injection.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female breast cancer patients histologically confirmed as HER2-positive. 2. Have completed at least one subcutaneous injection of Phesgo, with at least three planned injections remaining. 3. No history of acute allergic reactions (e.g., Grade 1-2 allergic reactions) during previous Phesgo injections. 4. Aged between 18 and 70 years (inclusive). 5. No use of pain medications, pain patches, or pain pumps for pain management within 3 days prior to injection. 6. Normal activity level (ECOG score 0-2), no limb paralysis, and able to clearly express personal feelings. 7. Signed informed consent form and voluntarily agreed to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of any skin diseases or conditions affecting subcutaneous injection (e.g., severe infection or dermatitis at the injection site). 2. Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials that may interfere with the results of this study. 3. Cognitive impairment or mental illness preventing completion of study questionnaires and assessments. 4. Regular use of analgesics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity scoreAssess immediately after injection, and at 30 minutes, 24 hours, and 48 hours after injectionMeasure using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTYanting Peng, Bachelor's Degree
472195985@qq.com86+13710350704
CONTACTYunfang Yu, Doctoral Degree / Ph.D.
18324208@QQ.com86+18928926137
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYanting Peng, Bachelor's Degree

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSun Yat-sen University

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026