Skip to content

Impact of Platelet Concentration in PRP on TMJ Subluxation

Effect of Platelet Concentration in Platelet-Rich Plasma on Prolotherapy Outcomes in Temporomandibular Joint Subluxation: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07532798
Acronym
PRPTMJ
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2017-07-01
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)

Keywords

TMJ subluxation, Temporomandibular joint subluxation, TMJ hypermobility, Recurrent TMJ dislocation, Platelet-rich plasma, PRP prolotherapy

Brief summary

This study is about a treatment for a jaw condition called temporomandibular joint (TMJ) subluxation. In this condition, the jaw can move too far forward during mouth opening, which may cause repeated jaw locking and problems with normal function. The treatment being studied is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. PRP is made from a person's own blood and may help improve joint stability and reduce symptoms. In this study, 40 adults with TMJ subluxation were randomly assigned to receive PRP with either a lower or higher platelet concentration. Each participant received 2 injections, given 2 weeks apart. The study measured jaw pain, how often locking happened, mouth opening, and joint clicking before treatment, after 6 months, and after 5 years. The goal of this study is to find out whether the amount of platelets in PRP changes how well this treatment works.

Detailed description

This prospective, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate whether platelet concentration influences the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prolotherapy in the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) subluxation. TMJ subluxation is characterized by recurrent episodes of excessive anterior translation of the mandibular condyle beyond the articular eminence, often resulting in transient jaw locking and functional impairment. A total of 40 adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with TMJ subluxation according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), supported by imaging evidence, were enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: low-concentration PRP (L-PRP) and high-concentration PRP (H-PRP). PRP was prepared using standardized centrifugation protocols (1,500 rpm for L-PRP and 3,200 rpm for H-PRP). All participants received two intra-articular and pericapsular injections separated by a 2-week interval. The primary outcomes were TMJ pain on function, assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and frequency of joint locking (episodes/day). Secondary outcomes included maximal mouth opening (MMO, mm) and presence of joint clicking. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 5 years following treatment. The study aimed to determine whether variations in platelet concentration affect clinical outcomes of PRP prolotherapy and to provide evidence for optimizing PRP preparation protocols in the management of TMJ subluxation.

Interventions

PROCEDURELow Platelet Concentration PRP (L-PRP)

Intra-articular and pericapsular injection of platelet-rich plasma prepared with Low platelet concentration..

PROCEDUREHigh Platelet Concentration PRP (L-PRP)

Intra-articular and pericapsular injection of platelet-rich plasma prepared with high platelet concentration.

Sponsors

IBB University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The clinician performing the intervention was not blinded due to the nature of the procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients aged ≥ 18 years -

Exclusion criteria

patients aged \< 18 years \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TMJ Pain on FunctionBaseline, 6 months, and 5 yearsPain during jaw function measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst pain.
Frequency of TMJ lockingBaseline, 6 months, and 5 yearsFrequency of locking, expressed as number of episodes per day

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum mouth opening (MMO)Baseline, 6 months, and 5 yearsMMO measured as the distance in mm between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors using a ruler.
Presence of joint clickingBaseline, 6 months, and 5 yearsTMJ clicking, recorded as present or absent based on periauricular palpation during mandibular movement.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHamida Refai, PhD

Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026