Skip to content

Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies

Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07532616
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing

Brief summary

Teaching intervention

Detailed description

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance

Interventions

This study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course

Sponsors

Chung Shan Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* student over 20 years old

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
metacognitive self-regulated learning abilityWeeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.
teamworkWeeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.
self-efficacyWeeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026