Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing
Conditions
Brief summary
Teaching intervention
Detailed description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance
Interventions
This study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* student over 20 years old
Exclusion criteria
* none
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| metacognitive self-regulated learning ability | Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester. | A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. |
| teamwork | Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester. | The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork. |
| self-efficacy | Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester. | The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy. |
Countries
Taiwan