Skip to content

Safety and Clinical Applicability of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) in Geographic Atrophy

Safety and Clinical Applicability of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) in Geographic Atrophy Under Everyday Conditions - a Multicentric, Randomized, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07531927
Acronym
TES-GAP
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-04-15
Start date
2026-05-05
Completion date
2028-06-01
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

TES, TcES, OkuStim, OkuStim 2, Okuvision, Electrical Stimulation, Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation, Geographic Atrophy, AMD

Brief summary

Geographic atrophy (GA) is a progressive eye disease that causes the degeneration of the retinal cells, particularly in the macula, leading to vision loss. The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) therapy with the OkuStim 2 System in patients with geographic atrophy (GA). Researchers will compare the effects of two different electrical stimuli with a placebo to see if the stimuli are safe and can slow down the progression of the disease. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these three groups: * TES-treatment with a rectangular stimulus * TES-treatment with a repetitive ramp stimulus * Placebo (sham) treatment Participants will apply the therapy at home, once a week for 30 minutes each over a duration of 1 year.

Detailed description

Geographic atrophy (GA) is a progressive eye disease that causes the degeneration of the retinal cells, particularly in the macula, leading to vision loss. Currently, there is no approved therapy specifically for GA in Europe. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of the treatment of visual field defects in patients with GA using transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) with the OkuStim 2 System. One of the main mechanisms for the loss of retinal cells in GA is inflammation. It is known from preclinical studies that electrical stimulation of the eye can inhibit inflammation or cellular reactions to inflammatory processes in the retina, trigger neuroprotective mechanisms and promote blood flow in the retina. The multicentric, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study is based on the assumption that these mechanisms can maintain the functional integrity of the outer zone of the lesion area for longer. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1:1 to one of these three groups: * TES-treatment with a rectangular stimulus * TES-treatment with a repetitive ramp stimulus * Placebo (sham) treatment After an initial training phase, participants will apply the therapy at home, once a week for 30 minutes each over a duration of 1 year. Only one eye will be treated (study eye).

Interventions

In TES therapy with the OkuStim 2 System, retinal stimulation is achieved through transcorneal current application: using a thread electrode, the OkuEl M, a weak current (≤ 1mA) is introduced onto the surface of the eye, which spreads through the eye towards the retina.

Sponsors

Okuvision GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
CONVIDIA clinical research GmbH
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nubilaria Srl
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
TentaConsult Pharma & Med GmbH
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
CollaboratorOTHER
Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Steinbeis-Forschungszentrum, GRADE Reading Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Clinical Study Core Unit SZB, Studienzentrum Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patient is masked to the treatment group he or she has been assigned to. The programming of the stimulation parameters on the OkuStim 2 is carried out by unmasked members of the study team as it is impossible to program the OkuStim 2 without knowing the assignment of the patient to the study group. Examinations relating to the primary, secondary or exploratory endpoints are carried out only by masked team members.

Intervention model description

Patients are assigned 1:1:1 to one of three different groups: Sham group (sham treatment), biphasic rectangular pulses, or repetitive ramp stimulus.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to understand the study and provide informed consent * 60 years of age or older * Diagnosis of geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration confirmed by imaging * The affected area in the eye must be within a defined size range and clearly visible on imaging * Eye conditions must allow for good-quality images and reliable measurements * Must have a minimum level of visual acuity * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test, and must agree to use effective contraception during the study (women who are postmenopausal or surgically sterile are not subject to pregnancy-related requirements)

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of certain eye conditions (e.g. macular edema, abnormal blood vessel growth or related conditions, retinal detachment, blood vessel blockage) in the study eye * Previous major eye surgeries (including retinal surgery or vitrectomy) * Previous laser treatment or injections in the study eye * Any other eye condition that could interfere with vision tests, imaging or study results * Planned eye surgery during the study period * Recent treatment with investigational drugs for geographic atrophy * Presence of active medical implants * Serious or uncontrolled systemic diseases, history of epilepsy or poor general health or conditions affecting the ability to follow study procedures * Participation in another clinical study recently or at the same time * Breastfeeding, relevant allergies (e.g. to silver), or heavy smoking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of TES therapy in GAFrom enrolment until the end of the study for the individual participant at 52 weeksDetermined by the nature and number of device-related adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on the progression of GA lesion areasAt 12 months and at timepoints in between (4, 17 and 34 weeks after the baseline-visit) compared to baselineAssessed by fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in combination with optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on structural changes in retinal layersAt 12 months and at timepoints in between (4, 17 and 34 weeks after the baseline-visit) compared to baselineAssessed by OCT
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on functional changes in the border zone of GA areasAt 12 months and at timepoints in between (17 and 34 weeks after the baseline-visit) compared to baselineAssessed by patient-tailored microperimetry (mMAIA)
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on visual acuity under normal luminance conditionsAt 12 months and at timepoints in between (4, 17 and 34 weeks after the baseline-visit) compared to baselineAssessed with ETDRS chart
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on visual acuity under low-luminance conditionsAt 12 months and at timepoints in between (4, 17 and 34 weeks after the baseline-visit) compared to baselineAssessed with ETDRS chart and a neutral density filter
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on patient-reported outcomes regarding the impact on daily lifeAt 12 months compared to baselineAssessed with the Vision Impairment in Low Luminance (VILL-33) questionnaire
Effects of TES therapy with two different stimulus waveforms on patient-reported outcome regarding the applicability of the therapy under everyday conditions during home-useAt 12 months compared to baselineAssessed with a custom-made questionnaire

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTRuth Schippert, PhD
studies@okuvision.de+49 7121 15935
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFlorian Gekeler, Prof. Dr.

Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026