Skip to content

Evaluation of Indian Gooseberry/ Amla in the Management of Chronic Periodontitis

Evaluation of Amla (Emblica Officinalis) as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy in Patients With Chronic Periodontitis -A Clinical and Biochemical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07531823
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-15
Start date
2020-03-20
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2026-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Periodontitis

Keywords

chronic periodontitis, Emblica officinalis (amla), antioxidant

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of amla (Emblica officinalis) on patients with chronic generalized periodontitis, using a single-blind, randomized controlled study design. 1. At baseline, all participants fulfilling the I/E criteria would be randomized into Arm I or II. 2. All participants in Arm I and II would undergo scaling and root planing (SRP). 3. After 1 month, Arm I participants would receive adjunct amla for 2 weeks, and Arm II participants would receive no treatment. 4. Both arms would be followed until the end of 6 months and evaluated for clinical and biochemical parameters.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, involving thirty chronic generalized periodontitis patients aged between 25 to 60 years. Participants fulfilling the Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria participants would be randomized to Arm I or II. They would be subjected to scaling and root planing (SRP). After 1 month, Arm I participants would be given amla for 2 weeks, while no adjunct therapy is planned for the participants in Arm II. Clinical parameters such as plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment loss would be assessed at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Biochemical parameters malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GTH) would be measured by spectrophotometry, while ELISA would be performed to assess the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF- α), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in serum and saliva, at baseline and 6 months. Statistical analysis is proposed using SPSS or STATA 14 package.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTScaling and root planing + Amla

Chronic generalized patients were randomly assigned to Arm I and Arm II. Arm I participants underwent scaling and root planing followed by consumption of a whole amla berry.

OTHERScaling and root planing

Chronic generalized patients were randomly assigned to Arm I and Arm II. Arm II participants underwent scaling and root planing only.

Sponsors

Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigator and outcome assessor were not aware of the arms or the intervention received. The additional intervention (amla dispensing) was conducted by another member, not involved in the study.

Intervention model description

The study is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial, where one arm receives scaling and root planing along with amla (after 1 month of SRP). The other arm receives only scaling and root planing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients who have at least 20 remaining teeth, with chronic generalized periodontitis, as defined as \> 30 % sites involved (extent) and with moderate to severe involvement (severity) as characterized by \> 2 interproximal sites with clinical attachment loss (CAL) \> 4mm (not on the same tooth) AND/OR \> 5 mm, probing depth (not on the same tooth) AND/OR \> 2 interproximal sites with CAL \> 6 mm AND 1 interproximal site with PD \> 5mm. 2. Systemically healthy patients

Exclusion criteria

1. Medically compromised patients 2. Smokers 3. Pregnant and lactating women 4. Patients on cholesterol-lowering medication 5. Patients who had received any antimicrobial therapy in the past 2 months, on ongoing antimicrobial therapy, or would receive antimicrobials during the course of the study. 6. Patients who had undergone any periodontal surgery in the past 6 months 7. Patients with a high caries index 8. Patients with severe tooth hypersensitivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in clinical parameters (plaque index)1, 3 and 6 monthsImprovement in plaque index
Improvement in clinical parameters (gingival index)1,3 and 6 monthsImprovement in gingival index
Improvement in clinical parameters (bleeding index)1,3 and 6 monthsImprovement in bleeding index
Improvement in clinical parameters (probing pocket depth)1,3 and 6 monthsImprovement in probing pocket depth
Improvement in clinical parameters (clinical attachment level)1,3 and 6 monthsImprovement in clinical attachment level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in antioxidant levels (Malondialdehyde) in saliva and serum6 monthsChanges in levels of Malondialdehyde
Changes in antioxidant levels (glutathione) in saliva and serum6 monthsChanges in glutathione levels
Changes in anti-inflammatory marker levels (CRP) in serum and saliva6 monthsChanges in C reactive protein levels
Changes in anti-inflammatory marker levels (TNF-alpha) in serum and saliva6 monthsChanges in TNF-alpha levels

Countries

India

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGrace T Paul, MDS

Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 22, 2026