Skip to content

Probiotic and Synbiotic Supplements in Hemodialysis Patients

Effects of Probiotic and Synbiotic Administration on the Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics of Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07531186
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-15
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2025-10-05
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Hemodialysis, Kidney Failure, Chronic

Keywords

Probiotic, Synbiotic, Hemodialysis, Uremic toxins, p-Cresyl sulfate, Gut microbiota, End stage renal disease, Quality of life, Cognitive function, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

This single-center randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of natural probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on clinical and biochemical characteristics in adults with end-stage renal disease receiving maintenance hemodialysis at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt. Participants were randomized into three groups (control, probiotic, and synbiotic), with supplementation given for 6 months in the intervention groups. The study assessed changes in uremic toxins (including p-cresyl sulfate) as the primary outcome, and cardiovascular parameters, quality of life, and cognitive function as secondary outcomes. The trial aimed to determine whether modulation of gut microbiota with probiotics or synbiotics can improve outcomes in hemodialysis patients

Detailed description

End-stage renal disease patients receiving hemodialysis commonly have intestinal dysbiosis and accumulation of gut-derived uremic toxins. Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may help modulate gut microbiota and reduce uremic toxin burden, but direct comparative data between probiotic and synbiotic strategies in hemodialysis patients are limited. This study was designed to assess the effects of natural probiotic and synbiotic administration on the clinical and biochemical characteristics and uremic toxin levels of hemodialysis patients at the Urology and Nephrology Center (UNC), Mansoura University, Egypt. This was a single-center randomized controlled trial with single-blind allocation. Sixty adult patients with end-stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis were included (dropout-inflated sample size; calculated minimum sample size was 48). Participants were randomized into three groups: a control group (20 patients), a probiotic group (20 patients), and a synbiotic group (20 patients). The probiotic and synbiotic groups received supplementation for 6 months; the synbiotic intervention included natural probiotic supplementation combined with prebiotic fibers (oat). Regular hemodialysis was standardized during the trial (3 sessions/week, 4 hours/session). The primary outcome was the effect of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on uremic toxin levels, including p-cresyl sulfate. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular-related parameters and comorbid clinical measures, including body mass index, anemia/ESA resistance, quality of life, and cognitive function. Assessments included laboratory testing (biochemical parameters and uremic toxins), echocardiographic evaluation by blinded cardiologists, and psychological assessment using cognitive testing (MOCA) and quality-of-life evaluation (KDQOL-36). The completed thesis reports that both probiotic and synbiotic supplementation reduced serum p-cresyl sulfate compared with control, with a more pronounced reduction in the synbiotic group, and that some cardiovascular and quality-of-life parameters improved, while cognitive and other secondary outcomes were less pronounced. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups, supporting successful randomization.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNatural Probiotic Supplement

Oral natural probiotic supplementation was administered in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNatural Synbiotic Supplement (Probiotic + Prebiotic Oat Fiber)

Oral synbiotic supplementation (natural probiotic plus prebiotic fiber \[oat\]) was administered in addition to standard maintenance hemodialysis care for 6 months.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This was a single-blind randomized trial. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Echocardiography was performed and interpreted by cardiologists who were unaware of the intervention allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older. * End-stage renal disease patients on regular maintenance hemodialysis * Not under active preparation for kidney transplantation within the next year (i.e., not planned for transplantation for more than one year)

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Under active preparation for kidney transplantation * Pregnancy * Active malignancy * Known structural gastrointestinal tract disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum p-Cresyl Sulfate (PCS)Baseline and 6 monthsSerum p-cresyl sulfate level is measured in blood. Outcome is the change from baseline to the end of the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life (Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36)Baseline and 6 monthsKidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) questionnaire. Scores are reported for the KDQOL-36 subscales: Symptom/Problem List (0-100), Effects of Kidney Disease (0-100), and Burden of Kidney Disease (0-100), and the generic health components derived from the SF-12 (Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary). For the 0-100 KDQOL-36 subscales, higher scores indicate better quality of life (fewer symptoms/less burden). The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Cognitive Function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)Baseline and 6 monthsThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test of global cognitive function. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Outcome is a change in the MoCA total score from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)Baseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular ejection fraction measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months. A higher percentage indicates better systolic function.
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)Baseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV)Baseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular end-systolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)Baseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular mass index measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)Baseline and 6 monthsBlood urea nitrogen is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Serum CreatinineBaseline and 6 monthsSerum creatinine is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Serum PotassiumBaseline and 6 monthsSerum potassium is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in Serum PhosphorusBaseline and 6 monthsSerum phosphorus is measured in blood. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.
Change in HemoglobinBaseline and 6 monthsHemoglobin is measured on a complete blood count. The outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026