Prediction of Visual Feedback Effects on Speech Motor Adaptation in Healthy Adults

Healthy Volunteers, Speech

speech motor control, altered auditory feedback, biofeedback, sensorimotor adaptation, computational modeling

This study examines whether individual differences in how speakers respond to hearing versus physical sensation during speech can predict who benefits most from visual feedback during a speech task. Healthy adults will complete a series of tasks in which auditory feedback is altered in real time through headphones, with and without an added visual display of the speech signal. A computational model will be used to estimate how strongly each participant relies on hearing versus physical sensation when monitoring speech. The study will then test whether this individual profile predicts how much the visual display improves each participant's ability to respond to the altered feedback.

During speech, the brain relies on multiple sources of feedback, including auditory input and physical sensations from the tongue and lips, to monitor and adjust speech in real time. People differ in how much they rely on each of these feedback sources, and these individual differences may predict who benefits most from different types of technological support for speech learning. This study examines whether a computational model of individual response to sensory feedback can predict how much a person benefits from the addition of real-time visual feedback during a speech task. Participants will complete a series of tasks in which auditory feedback of speech is altered in real time through headphones. A computational model is then used to estimate how strongly each participant relies on hearing versus physical sensation when monitoring speech. Participants then repeat the task with an added visual display showing the speech signal alongside a target, providing an additional source of feedback. The primary question is whether the computational profile of sensory feedback use - specifically, whether a person relies more heavily on hearing or on physical sensation - predicts how much the visual display improves each participant's ability to respond to the altered feedback. At baseline, participants complete two versions of an altered auditory feedback (AAF) task without visual feedback. The first uses a "fast adapt" design in which altered feedback is introduced and withdrawn repeatedly across short experimental runs; the second uses a standard adaptive design in which the altered feedback is introduced once and maintained for a longer run. Performance in both tasks is submitted to SimpleDIVA computational modeling to estimate participant-specific auditory and somatosensory response parameters. The use of two task variants allows evaluation of the stability of parameter estimates across elicitation conditions. Participants then complete a standard adaptive AAF task with simultaneous real-time visual-acoustic biofeedback. The visual display presents the current audio playback signal (i.e., the altered signal) alongside a visual target derived from the participant's baseline production. The primary outcome measure is visual gain, defined as the within-participant difference in compensation magnitude between the auditory-visual feedback condition and the auditory-only condition of the standard adaptive AAF task. The primary analysis uses linear regression to test whether SimpleDIVA parameters from the baseline phase predict the magnitude of visual gain. The predictor of primary interest is the ratio of auditory to total sensory weighting, reflecting the relative dominance of auditory versus somatosensory feedback. Baseline compensation magnitude in the auditory-only condition will be included as a covariate. A paired-samples t-test will also evaluate the overall effect of adding visual feedback on compensation magnitude across the sample.

No related papers found yet.

United States