Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Ketamine Combination Versus Propofol Monotherapy in Geriatric Patients Under Invasive Ventilation

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Ketamine Combination Versus Propofol Monotherapy in Geriatric Patients Under Invasive Ventilation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07530146
Enrollment
41
Registered
2026-04-15
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The Critically Ill Patient is Requiring Intubation, Septic Shock, Pneumonia

Keywords

ketofol, propofol, septic shock, pneumonia, geriatric, elderly, critical ill, ICU patient, intubation

Brief summary

The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of propofol-ketamine ("Ketofol") versus propofol monotherapy in geriatric ICU patients. Eligible participants are critically ill elderly patients with a history of cardiac disease who require endotracheal intubation and have not yet received sedation. The investigators focus on a specific population in which geriatric patients have different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and are more prone to side effects than other populations. Primary outcome: Incidence of hemodynamic instability (defined as hypotension requiring vasopressors), measured by mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline, during intubation, and post-intubation at 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes, then hourly for 24 hours.

Interventions

Patients will take bolus dose of Propofol 0.25 mg/kg + Ketamine 0.25mg/kg If patient NOT sedated and need additional doses will be given another Propofol 0.25 mg/kg + Ketamine 0.25mg/kg IV

Propofol given normal doses for intubation but at reduced and gradual dosing regimen regarding geriatric patient

Sponsors

Helwan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years * Admitted to ICU with a diagnosis of infection (sepsis, septic shock, or pneumonia) * Known history of cardiac disease (e.g., ischemic heart disease, heart failure, arrhythmias) * Requiring endotracheal intubation for airway protection or respiratory failure * Informed consent obtained from patient or legal representative * Patient NOT on sedation prior randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy or contraindication to propofol or ketamine * Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction (Child-Pugh C, eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²) * Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP \> 180 mmHg or DBP \> 110 mmHg) * Intracranial pathology (e.g., raised intracranial pressure, recent stroke, brain tumor) * Ongoing use of other sedative or anesthetic agents within 12 hours prior to intubation * Do-not-intubate or do-not-resuscitate orders * Participation in another interventional trial within the last 30 days * History of Psychosis * Severe Organ Dysfunction: Patients with Child-Pugh C hepatic failure * • Severe hypotension despite vasopressor therapy (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \< 70 mmHg)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean arterial blood pressurebaseline then at 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes, then hourly for 24 hourshemodynamic stability, defined as MAP measured Baseline then during and post intubation at 1min , 3min , 5min 10min, 20min , 30min , 60min then hourly for 24h.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to successful intubationwithin 1 hoursTime to successful intubation (from induction to tube placement confirmation

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026