Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment Resistant Depression
Conditions
Keywords
tms, eeg
Brief summary
This study tests whether a brain stimulation treatment for depression called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be improved by tailoring it to each individual. A type of brain signal measured with electroencephalography (EEG) after a single pulse of brain stimulation, called an early local TMS-evoked potential (EL-TEP), is used to identify which stimulation settings work best for each participant. The investigators will compare individualized (personalized) iTBS settings to standard (non-personalized) settings and to inactive (sham) stimulation. Participants are adults with treatment-resistant depression.
Interventions
Intermittent theta burst stimulation delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using individualized pulse count (600, 1200, or 1800 pulses) and intensity (90% or 120% rMT) determined by EL-TEP screening.
Intermittent theta burst stimulation delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at fixed parameters: 1800 pulses, 120% resting motor threshold.
Inactive sham stimulation using a shielded coil with electrical scalp stimulation to mimic sensory experience of active iTBS.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
All participants receive all three arms.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 18-65 years * Clinical diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), confirmed by structured clinical interview * Current moderate-to-severe depressive episode (MADRS score ≥ 20) * Moderate-to-severe treatment resistance, assessed using the Maudsley Staging Method * Able to comprehend English sufficiently to complete study procedures and assessments * Able to maintain stable antidepressant regimen or remain medication-free for at least 4 weeks prior to and during the study
Exclusion criteria
* Primary psychiatric diagnosis other than MDD * Contraindications to MRI (e.g., implanted metal) * Conditions or medications that may increase risk associated with TMS * Prior exposure to repetitive TMS (rTMS) * Non-response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) * History of psychosurgery for depression * High suicidal risk as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Early Local TMS-Evoked Potential (EL-TEP) Amplitude | Baseline, end of 10 iTBS sessions within a single testing day (10 hours) | EL-TEP amplitude is the peak-to-trough amplitude of the early (20-60 ms) EEG response recorded over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex following single TMS pulses. Percent change is calculated from pre-iTBS to post-iTBS for each stimulation condition. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acute EL-TEP Suppression Following Each Screened iTBS Condition | Baseline, end of each iTBS session during the screening phase (3 screening days, up to approximately 3 weeks) | Percent change in EL-TEP amplitude from before to after each of the six screened iTBS parameter combinations during the screening phase. |
| Trajectory of EL-TEP Change Across Multiple Sessions Within a Testing Day | Baseline, before and after sessions 1, 2, 3, and 10 within a single testing day (10 hours) | EL-TEP amplitude measured before and after sessions 1, 2, 3, and 10 on each testing day to characterize cumulative effects. |
| Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Clinician-administered scale assessing depressive symptom severity. Score range: 0-60 (higher scores indicate greater severity). |
| Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Score | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Self-report measure of depressive symptom severity. Score range: 0-27 (higher scores indicate greater severity). |
| Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7) Score | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Self-report measure of anxiety symptom severity. Score range: 0-21 (higher scores indicate greater severity). |
| Change in N-Back Task Performance | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Working memory performance assessed using the N-back task. Outcome is accuracy and reaction time. |
| Change in Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) Performance | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Executive function assessed using the MSIT. Outcome is accuracy and reaction time. |
| Change in Affective Processing Task Performance | Baseline, end of each testing day (up to approximately 7 weeks) | Emotional face recognition task performance. Outcome is accuracy. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Stanford University