Skip to content

Cognitive Enhancement in Recurrent Depression (The COG-D-R Study)

Cognitive Enhancement in Recurrent Depression (The COG-D-R Study)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07527273
Enrollment
69
Registered
2026-04-14
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Depression, Cognitive Symptoms

Keywords

geriatrics, aging, elderly, cognition, memory, thinking, depression, tDCS, cognitive training, cognitive remediation, digital therapeutics

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a combination of non-drug treatments works to benefit memory, thinking, and brain functioning in older individuals with recurrent depression. The non-drug approaches the investigators are studying include transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and computerized cognitive training. tDCS uses small currents of electricity on the forehead to potentially stimulate your brain's ability to process and learn. Computerized cognitive training uses tablet games to improve memory and thinking. In this study, two different cognitive training programs are being investigated, both of which are stimulating and designed to engage brain activity. One that is believed to be a specific treatment for depression, while the other provides extra stimulation for the brain that is non-specific. Two different tDCS parameters - active stimulation and sham (or placebo) stimulation - are also being investigated. Participants will be randomized to one of three study groups: 1. Depression cognitive training treatment with active brain stimulation 2. Depression cognitive training treatment with sham brain stimulation 3. Non-specific cognitive training treatment with sham brain stimulation The main questions this clinical trial aims to answer are: * Does "depression cognitive training treatment with active brain stimulation" benefit thinking and memory more so than the other treatments? * Does "depression cognitive training treatment with active brain stimulation" benefit brain functioning more so than the other treatments? Participants will: * Complete several baseline and post-intervention visits at the research center for checkups and tests over the course of 3-4 months. * Visit the research center daily for 4 weeks to complete their assigned treatment.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether stepwise engagement of the frontal lobe across randomized groups (active tDCS+depression cognitive training \> sham tDCS+depression cognitive training \> sham tDCS+non-specific cognitive training) will result in progressively greater improvements in executive functions and memory, as well as intrinsic functional connectivity of the Executive Control Network (ECN), in older adults with recurrent depression. The investigators will randomize 69 elderly depressed outpatients into one of three conditions daily over 4-weeks. Psychiatric and neuropsychological evaluations, as well as multimodal neuroimaging (focused on the ECN) will be obtained at baseline and following intervention completion to look at acute and long-term effects.

Interventions

A Soterix Clinical Trials Direct Current Stimulator will apply 20 minutes of 2.0 milliamps (mA) direct current through two bicarbon rubber electrodes encased in saline soaked 5 cm x 7 cm sponges (8 cc of 0.9% saline solution per sponge) placed over the frontal cortices at F3 and F4 (via 10-20 system).

Sham stimulation will be performed with the same device and all procedures will be identical except for the duration of stimulation. Participants will receive 30 seconds of 2 mA of direct current stimulation at the beginning of the session. Participants habituate to the sensation of tDCS within 30-60 seconds of stimulation. This procedure provides the same sensation of tDCS without the full duration of stimulation, making it a highly effective sham procedure.

BEHAVIORALDepression Cognitive Training

Computerized cognitive training targeting the underlying cerebral networks associated with depression.

BEHAVIORALNon-Specific Cognitive Training

Computerized cognitive training that provides extra stimulation for the brain that is non-specific.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Triple-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 60 years * Evidence of executive dysfunction via SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS (At least one subdomain of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function in Adults (BRIEF-A) at T \> 65, or At least one average score of \> 1.5 on Planning, Organization, or Attention subdomains of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog)) or OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE (At least one demographically adjusted z-score \> -1.0 SD below the mean on a measure of executive functioning (Digits backward, Trails B, or total Verbal Fluency) on the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set 3.0). * DSM-5 diagnosis of a current or past (within last 3 years) depressive episode (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Persistent Depressive Disorder (PDD)) via the using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5). * Presence of 2 or more lifetime depressive episodes to be considered "recurrent." * Either stable antidepressant regimen for at least 6 weeks or no current antidepressant treatment (no plans to change treatment over course of study). * Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

* Other psychiatric conditions via the SCID-5 (including history of bipolar disorder and psychosis, excluding comorbid anxiety disorders) * Severe depression (MADRS score \> 29) * Acute suicidality on clinical evaluation by study clinician and via response on MADRS item 10 (score of 4 or more would require further assessment) * Acute grief (occurring within past month) * History of alcohol use disorder or substance use disorder of moderate or greater severity in the last 12 months * Medications that would significantly interfere with tDCS effects (i.e., sodium channel blockers, GABA-ergic or glutamatergic drugs; see Appendix B for exclusionary list)40 * Primary neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy, brain tumor, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia diagnosis) * Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) \< 23 * Primary amnestic cognitive profile (\>1.5 SD below demographically-adjusted mean on NACC memory measures in context otherwise normal cognitive profile, or per clinician judgement) * Any physical or intellectual disability affecting ability to complete assessments * Unstable medical illness needing urgent treatment * MRI contraindications * Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in last 2 months * Current involvement in psychotherapy * Current involvement in other research studies (including but not limited to: neuromodulation \[TMS or tDCS\] or investigational drug studies). Observational studies \[without intervention\] are acceptable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NIH ExaminerBaseline, Following completion of the 4-week intervention, 3-month Post-InterventionThis objective cognitive test battery assesses a range of executive functions (working memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, and planning). The investigators will examine intervention-related change its Executive Composite Score (primary outcome), and subcomposite (Cognitive Control, Working Memory, and Fluency; secondary outcomes) scores, where higher scores indicate better performance.
Resting state fMRI functional connectivityBaseline, Following completion of the 4-week interventionFunctional connectivity from resting state fMRI will be processed using the CONN toolbox for connectivity, incorporating the Shaeffer network atlases to improve peer-research supported network usage in addition to the standard CONN atlases. A priori ROI-to-ROI analyses will be used to determine whether average connectivity changes in the Executive Control Network differs by treatment group. Analyses will control for multiple comparisons at false discovery rate (FDR) \< 0.05.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating ScaleBaseline and weekly thereafter, Following completion of the 4-week intervention, 3-Month Post-InterventionThe MADRS is a 10-item clinician-rated measure of depression severity, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. We will look at change in depression severity over the course of the intervention by treatment arm in Exploratory Analyses.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSarah Szymkowicz, PhD
sarah.szymkowicz@vumc.org615-875-0032

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 16, 2026