Skip to content

Improving Dementia Care in Primary Practice

Improving Dementia Care in Primary Practice

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07526480
Acronym
IDC
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-04-13
Start date
2026-05-04
Completion date
2027-05-03
Last updated
2026-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease (AD), Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Brief summary

This clinical trial will evaluate a multi-level scalable intervention called Improving Dementia Care (IDC). The investigators hypothesize that IDC will increase dementia detection in patients with impaired cognition more than the control condition, Enhanced Usual Care (EUC), over 6 months.

Detailed description

This pilot RCT (N = 80) will evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a new multi-level intervention-Improving Dementia Care (IDC)-which aims to increase detection of Alzheimer disease (AD) in older primary care patients with impaired cognition. In IDC, investigators will screen older primary care patients for subjective cognitive concerns and objective cognitive impairment on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS). To eligible patients, the research team will deliver AD Education and Personalized Decision Counseling-eliciting values and goals to reach informed, preference-based decisions on whether to have an AD evaluation. In IDC, investigators will also send to primary care physicians (PCPs) the TICS results and a smart order set (i.e., orders for AD-relevant lab and neuroimaging) via the electronic health record (EHR). The research team posits that IDC-a patient-level and PCP-level intervention-will increase AD detection more than Enhanced Usual Care (EUC), which is usual care enhanced with sending the TICS results and smart order set to the PCPs of controls-solely a PCP-level intervention. At 6 months, investigators will compare IDC's vs. EUC's effectiveness to increase rates of: 1) Incident cognitive diagnoses (e.g., Mild Cognitive Impairment, AD); 2) Orders for AD-relevant lab and neuroimaging studies, 3) Completed AD-relevant lab and neuroimaging studies; 4) Prescribed AD medications; and 5) Referrals to AD specialists, masked to treatment assignment.

Interventions

OTHERImproving Dementia Care

During a phone session, participants receive ADRD Education and Personalized Decision Counseling, which consists of eliciting values and goals to reach informed, preference-based decisions on whether to have an ADRD evaluation. Participants' primary care physicians are sent cognitive screening results and a smart order set (i.e., orders for ADRD-relevant lab and neuroimaging) via the electronic health record (EHR).

OTHEREnhanced Usual Care

Usual care enhanced with notices sent to participants' primary care physicians with cognitive screening results and a smart order set (i.e., orders for ADRD-relevant lab and neuroimaging) via the electronic health record (EHR).

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Independence Blue Cross
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment group in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The research team anticipates randomizing 40 participants to each treatment group (i.e., IDC and EUC). After randomization, the research team will send participants' PCPs cognitive screen results and a smart order set for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)-relevant lab tests and neuroimaging that meets current clinical practice guidelines. This information will be sent to PCPs regardless of treatment group assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
66 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* No previous diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). * Have a scheduled PCP visit in the next 4-6 weeks * Have subjective cognitive impairment * Score ≥ 26 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)

Exclusion criteria

* EHR evidence or previous cognitive evaluations, diagnosis of MCI or AD, or use of AD medications * TICS score of ≤ 11.00 * Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incident cognitive diagnoses.6 monthsChart reviews will identify the number of patients with a new cognitive diagnosis in each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Orders for Alzheimer's disease-relevant lab and neuroimaging6 monthsChart reviews will identify the number of patients with a new relevant lab and imaging tests.
Prescribed Alzheimer's disease (AD) medications.6 monthsChart reviews will identify the number of patients with a new AD medications.
Referrals to Alzheimer's disease specialists6 monthsChart reviews will identify the number of patients with relevant referrals.
Completed AD-relevant lab and neuroimaging studies6 monthsChart reviews will identify the number of patients with completed orders.

Contacts

CONTACTNina Diamond, MPH
nina.diamond@jefferosn.edu267-872-1302
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBarry Rovner, MD

Thomas Jefferson University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 18, 2026