Skip to content

Suzetrigine Frame Trial Comparing Suzetrigine and Acetaminophen

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Suzetrigine and Acetaminophen for Reducing Pain During Local Anesthetic Infiltration and Head Frame Application

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07525219
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-04-13
Start date
2026-06-22
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesic Efficacy

Keywords

procedural prophylaxis, anesthetic infiltration, stereotactic head frame

Brief summary

Local anesthetic infiltration is a primary source of acute pain during stereotactic procedures.

Detailed description

Frame placement can be painful even with local numbing medicine. This study compares two oral medications-Suzetrigine (an FDA-approved (January 30, 2025) non-opioid, non-addictive medication used to treat moderate-to-severe acute pain in adults)) and acetaminophen (Tylenol)-to see which is more effective at reducing this pain. Both Tylenol and Suzetrigine are currently being used for pain prevention during head frame placement. This study is being conducted to determine if one offers greater relief than the other.

Interventions

DRUGSuzetrigine

100mg - Medication is self-administered at home on an empty stomach approximately 1-6 hours prior to the procedure.

DRUGacetaminophen

1000mg - Medication is self-administered at home on an empty stomach approximately 1-6 hours prior to the procedure.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Both suzetrigine and acetaminophen will be placed into identical opaque capsules. Suzetrigine capsules will be backfilled with an inert excipient to match the weight and sound of the acetaminophen capsules.

Intervention model description

After study consent is obtained. Subjects will be randomized to one of two arms. Each arm contains a medication currently being used in stereotactic frame placement. Arm 1 will be Acetaminophen and Arm 2 will be Suzetrigine.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for a standard of care procedure requiring a stereotactic head frame to be placed

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not scheduled for a standard of care procedure requiring a stereotactic head frame to be placed will not be approached

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS-Anxiety) scoreBaselineA single consolidated VAS score (0-10) representing the pain experienced during the administration of local anesthetic across all four pin sites. This VAS is administered immediately after the local anesthetic injections are completed. For anxiety-VAS cutoff value = 40: the VAS score is ≥40 in 81% of patients with anxiety (sensitivity); the VAS score is \<40 in 70% of patients without anxiety (specificity); 67% of patients with a VAS score ≥ 40 have anxiety (PPV); 82% of patients with a VAS score \<40 do not have anxiety (NPV).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS-Infiltration) scoreBaselineA single consolidated VAS score (0-10) representing the pain experienced during the administration of local anesthetic across all four pin sites. This VAS is administered immediately after the local anesthetic injections are completed. For anxiety-VAS cutoff value = 40: the VAS score is ≥40 in 81% of patients with anxiety (sensitivity); the VAS score is \<40 in 70% of patients without anxiety (specificity); 67% of patients with a VAS score ≥ 40 have anxiety (PPV); 82% of patients with a VAS score \<40 do not have anxiety (NPV).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS-Pin Tightening) scoreBaselineA single consolidated VAS score (0-10) representing the pain experienced during the administration of local anesthetic across all four pin sites. This VAS is administered immediately after the local anesthetic injections are completed. For anxiety-VAS cutoff value = 40: the VAS score is ≥40 in 81% of patients with anxiety (sensitivity); the VAS score is \<40 in 70% of patients without anxiety (specificity); 67% of patients with a VAS score ≥ 40 have anxiety (PPV); 82% of patients with a VAS score \<40 do not have anxiety (NPV).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS-Anxiety Reassessment) scoreHour 24A single consolidated VAS score (0-10) representing the pain experienced during the administration of local anesthetic across all four pin sites. This VAS is administered immediately after the local anesthetic injections are completed. For anxiety-VAS cutoff value = 40: the VAS score is ≥40 in 81% of patients with anxiety (sensitivity); the VAS score is \<40 in 70% of patients without anxiety (specificity); 67% of patients with a VAS score ≥ 40 have anxiety (PPV); 82% of patients with a VAS score \<40 do not have anxiety (NPV).
Total Anesthetic VolumeHour 6Documentation of the total volume (mL) of local anesthetic infused.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Clinically Significant Vasovagal EpisodesHour 6Documentation of any vasovagal response characterized by loss of color, sweating, and/or nausea that requires rescue via raising the patient's legs to a height higher than their head.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTWendy Jenkins, BSN RN, CCRC
Wendy.Jenkins@AdvocateHealth.org336.716.3842
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStephen B Tatter, MD

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026