Tooth Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The clinical performance of a bioactive composite (alkasite-based), a nanohybrid resin composite and a bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations will be evaluated and compared. After recruiting participants with at least 3 approximal caries lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. All caries lesions will be removed before restoring. Cavities will be divided into three groups: a bioactive composite \[Cention Forte Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein\], a nanohybrid resin composite \[Tetric N-Ceram2 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)\] and a bulk-fill resin composite \[Tetric N-PowerFill2 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)\], All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria after a week (baseline) 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
Interventions
DEVICEbioactive composite
bioactive composite restoration
nanohybrid resin composite restoration
DEVICEbulk-fill resin composite
bulk-fill resin composite restoration
Sponsors
Hacettepe University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* age range will be 18 to 65 * patients should have at least 3 approximal caries lesions require restoration * healthy periodontal status * a good likelihood of recall availability
Exclusion criteria
* poor gingival health * adverse medical history * potential behavioral problems
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria | two years | Two year results according to FDI criteria (scores 1-5, 1-very good, 5-poor/replace) |
Outcome results
None listed