Skip to content

Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Neck Disability and Cervical Range of Motion in Individuals With Non-Specific Neck Pain

The Effect of Muscle Energy Technique on Neck Disability and Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Non-Specific Neck Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07524075
Acronym
MET-NP
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-13
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-07-15
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Non-specific Neck Pain

Keywords

Neck Pain, Non-Specific Neck Pain, Muscle Energy Technique, Cervical Range of Motion, Neck Disability

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of the Muscle Energy Technique on neck disability level and cervical range of motion in individuals with non-specific neck pain. The study will be conducted at Avicenna International Hospital in Istanbul. Participants with non-specific neck pain will be included in the study. The intervention will involve the application of Muscle Energy Technique, and outcomes will be assessed using standardized measures of neck disability and cervical range of motion. The findings are expected to contribute to improving treatment approaches for individuals with non-specific neck pain.

Detailed description

This study is designed to evaluate the effects of the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) on neck disability and cervical range of motion in individuals with non-specific neck pain. Non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that may lead to functional limitations and reduced quality of life. The study will be conducted at Avicenna International Hospital in Istanbul. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be recruited and evaluated before and after the intervention. The Muscle Energy Technique will be applied as the primary intervention. Outcome measures will include the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to assess disability level and goniometric measurements to evaluate cervical range of motion. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons will be performed to determine the effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of MET in the management of non-specific neck pain and contribute to physiotherapy practice.

Interventions

DEVICEArm 2- Standard Electrotherapy

Arm 2 - Standard Electrotherapy Participants in this group will receive a standard electrotherapy protocol applied to the cervical region. The intervention will be administered according to routine clinical practice for non-specific neck pain. Electrotherapy parameters will be applied consistently during the treatment sessions. No Muscle Energy Technique (MET) will be used in this group. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted to evaluate outcomes.

BEHAVIORALArm 1-Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Arm 1-The Muscle Energy Technique (MET) will be applied to the cervical region of participants with non-specific neck pain. The technique will involve the patient performing isometric muscle contractions against a therapist-applied resistance, followed by relaxation and stretching. The intervention will aim to reduce neck pain, improve neck disability, and increase cervical range of motion. The treatment will be applied in a standardized protocol over the study period, with pre- and post-intervention assessments conducted.

Sponsors

Uskudar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study is designed as a single-group interventional study. Participants diagnosed with non-specific neck pain will be evaluated before and after the intervention. The Muscle Energy Technique (MET) will be applied as the primary intervention. No control group will be included in this study. Pre- and post-intervention measurements will be used to assess changes in neck disability and cervical range of motion. The outcomes will be compared within the same group to determine the effectiveness of the intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 65 years Diagnosis of non-specific neck pain Presence of neck pain for at least 4 weeks Ability to understand and follow instructions Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

History of cervical spine surgery Presence of neurological deficits or radiculopathy Specific causes of neck pain (e.g., tumor, infection, fracture) Severe cervical disc herniation Pregnancy Any contraindication to manual therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability IndexBaseline and at the end of the 10-day treatment periodNeck disability will be assessed using a validated neck disability questionnaire (e.g., Neck Disability Index - NDI). This scale evaluates the level of disability related to neck pain and daily functional limitations. Neck Disability Index (NDI) score (range: 0 to 50; higher scores indicate greater disability and worse outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cervical Range of MotionBaseline and at the end of the 10-day treatment periodCervical range of motion (ROM) will be measured using a goniometer or inclinometer. rotation movements will be evaluated to determine the functional mobility of the cervical spine. Cervical Range of Motion (degrees; higher values indicate better mobility)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTDeniz Demirci, PhD
deniz.demirci@uskudar.edu.tr0090 533 240 86 61

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026