Skip to content

Effects of PACE Technique in Patients With Aphasia

Effects of PACE Technique in Patients With Aphasia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07521098
Enrollment
16
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
2025-03-18
Completion date
2025-06-29
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphasia, Broca

Brief summary

Aphasia, a communication disorder often resulting from him brain injury such as stroke, impacts an individual's ability to understand or produce language. It can manifest in various forms, such as difficulties with speaking, writing, reading, and comprehension, which severely impair daily functioning and quality of life. For adults with aphasia, regaining communication skills is often a critical aspect of rehabilitation, demanding a combination of therapeutic strategies. The Promoting Aphasics' Communicative Effectiveness (PACE) technique is a widely recognized approach to improve communication in individuals with aphasia. Developed in the late 20th century, the PACE technique focuses on naturalistic communication, encouraging patients to utilize any available communicative means verbal or non-verbal to convey messages effectively. By simulating real-world conversational scenarios in therapy, PACE aims to enhance both expressive and receptive communication skills, thereby facilitating better interaction in social contexts. This approach is especially beneficial for individuals with severe expressive language impairments, as it emphasizes the overall success of communication rather than linguistic accuracy. A descriptive experimental research design was followed in the present study to explore the effect of PACE technique in adults with Aphasia. The study will be conducted at DHQ Faisalabad. The Duration of study is relied on 16 sessions. Three sessions will be conducted per week and the duration of a session is about forty minutes. Sample size (N=16) (Control group =8, Experimental group=8). Patients who were identified with mile to moderate level of Aphasia are age of 45 to 65 years old. Group A will be an experimental group (who will receive both Conventional and Promoting Aphasic Communicative Effectiveness technique). Group B will be a controlled group (who will receive just Conventional Therapy). A randomized Clinical trial will employ to collect data from participants approach at DHQ Faisalabad.

Detailed description

This approach is especially beneficial for individuals with severe expressive language impairments, as it emphasizes the overall success of communication rather than linguistic accuracy. A descriptive experimental research design was followed in the present study to explore the effect of PACE technique in adults with Aphasia. The study will be conducted at DHQ Faisalabad. Sample size (N=16) (Control group =8, Experimental group=8). Patients who were identified with mild to moderate level of Aphasia are age of 45 to 65 years old. Group A will be an experimental group (who will receive both Conventional and Promoting Aphasic Communicative Effectiveness technique). Group B will be a controlled group (who will receive just Conventional Therapy). A randomized Clinical trial will employ to collect data from participants approach at DHQ Faisalabad.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALexperimental

Promoting Aphasics' Communicative Effectiveness (PACE) is a functional approach to aphasia intervention that emphasizes natural, interactive communication between the clinician and the individual with aphasia. Unlike traditional therapy, which often focuses on accuracy, PACE encourages any form of communication-verbal or non-verbal-such as gestures, drawing, writing, or using augmentative devices. The therapy is conducted in a conversational setting, where both participants exchange new information, ensuring the person with aphasia takes an active role in communication. By reducing pressure and promoting alternative communication strategies, PACE enhances confidence, encourages spontaneous language use, and helps individuals regain functional communication skills in real-life situations

OTHERcontrol group conventional therapy

Control Arm (Standard Therapy or No Treatment) Participants receive either traditional speech therapy (e.g., structured drills, naming tasks) or no treatment for comparison.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: Patients from age 45-65 years will be included in the study 1. Both gender male and female will be included in the study. 2. Diagnosed Adults with aphasia will be included in the study. 3. Severity level: Mild to moderate will be included in the study 4. Only non-fluent type of Aphasia will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Adult with any co-morbid condition will be excluded from study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test6 to 8 weeksThe Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MAST) is a brief and efficient tool designed to assess language abilities in individuals with aphasia, particularly those who have experienced a stroke or brain injury. It is a standardized screening test that evaluates various aspects of language function, including expressive and receptive abilities. The MAST consists of simple tasks such as naming, repetition, following commands, and verbal fluency, allowing clinicians to quickly identify language impairments. It is widely used due to its reliability, ease of administration, and effectiveness in detecting aphasia in both clinical and research setting

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMehwish Ikhlaque, MS

Riphah International University, Lahore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026