Skip to content

C-3002: Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening Access and Follow-up Care at 'CASCADE' Clinical Sites in the United States

C-3002: Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening Access and Follow-up Care at 'CASCADE' Clinical Sites in the United States

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07520188
Acronym
CASCADE3002
Enrollment
3500
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
2026-09-10
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer, Cervical Precancer, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

Keywords

screening

Brief summary

The purpose of the CASCADE-3002 project is to improve access to cervical cancer screening among women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) receiving care at U.S.-based CASCADE clinical sites. This study will assess the cervical cancer screening cascade and identify multilevel factors that impede access to screening among women with HIV attending Infectious Disease clinics in Georgia and Maryland. In parallel, the study will explore and develop implementation strategies for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection to increase screening uptake, adherence, and appropriate clinical follow-up in this population at elevated risk for cervical cancer. Cervical cancer remains a preventable malignancy; however, women with HIV are at substantially increased risk and experience higher rates of cervical cancer compared with women without HIV. The World Health Organization has called for the global elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem, defined as fewer than 4 incident cases per 100,000 women annually, with targets for vaccination, screening, and treatment coverage. Although the United States has the tools to approach near-elimination, disparities in healthcare access and screening persist, particularly among women with HIV.

Detailed description

This study consists of Aim 1 (with sub-aims 1a and 1b) and Aim 2. Aim 1a will document the cervical cancer screening cascade among screen-eligible women with HIV (WWH) receiving care in Infectious Disease HIV clinics affiliated with U.S.-based CASCADE Clinical Sites in Georgia (CS4) and Maryland (CS8). Aim 1a will involve a retrospective electronic health record chart review conducted by clinic staff to determine the number of WWH eligible for cervical cancer screening (defined as individuals aged 25 years and older with a cervix) and to assess their cervical cancer screening, follow-up and treatment history between September 1, 2022 and August 31, 2025. There is a waiver of consent for this medical record abstraction, and up to 2,500 records from Georgia and 1,000 records from Maryland will be extracted. Data collected will quantify screening eligibility, screening completion, abnormal results, follow-up procedures (including colposcopy), and treatment to identify gaps across the screening continuum. This clinical trials record includes Aim 1b and Aim 2 since Aim 1a is retrospective chart review. This clinical trials registration record represent Aim 1b and Aim 2 since Aim 1a is retrospective chart review. Aim 1b will consist of in-depth qualitative interviews with WWH identified through provider referral or response to clinic- or community-based fliers. Interviews will explore barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening and follow-up care and assess perspectives on how different HPV self-collection approaches could improve adherence and inform future guidelines. Participants will be stratified into three groups: Group 1 will include WWH from participating clinical sites with a history of abnormal screening who were screened according to national guidelines (up to 5 per clinic, up to 20 total), including at least one individual who underwent colposcopy and at least two per clinic who did not complete recommended follow-up colposcopy or treatment after abnormal results; Group 2 will include WWH from participating clinical sites who have not been screened according to national guidelines (up to 5 per clinic, up to 20 total) ), including a minimum of 1 individual who underwent colposcopy and 2 individuals from each clinic who have not engaged in follow-up colposcopy or treatment after abnormal screening results. Group 3 will include WWH recruited from community locations who are overdue for screening and have not been screened according to national guidelines (up to 10 WWH in Georgia and up to 5 in Maryland up to 15 total). The total number of IDIs will be up to 55. Aim 2 will use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement framework to plan for implementation of an HPV self-collection intervention among WWH within participating Infectious Disease clinics in Georgia and Maryland. Focus groups will be conducted with multidisciplinary health care providers caring for WWH to identify clinical workflow challenges, access barriers, and health system constraints related to existing cervical cancer screening and follow-up protocols and to inform development of an implementation strategy for HPV self-collection. Using the iterative PDSA process-planning a change, testing it on a small scale, studying results, and refining or adapting the approach-findings from Aims 1 and 2 will inform the development of a future Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial that will pilot implementation strategies while simultaneously collecting preliminary effectiveness data on HPV self-collection. The long-term objective is to improve cervical cancer screening uptake and timely follow-up among WWH in Infectious Disease clinic settings. The total number of participants in the focus groups will be up to 48.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALQualitative interviews

In-depth qualitative interviews will be conducted with women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) receiving care to explore barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening and follow-up care.

BEHAVIORALFocus groups

Focus groups will be conducted with multidisciplinary care team members to assess perceived clinical workflow challenges, access barriers, and health system constraints related to current cervical cancer screening and follow-up protocols.

Sponsors

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Aim 1a- Retrospective Chart Review Inclusion Criteria: Health records of WWH who are ages 25 and over, clients of the participating clinics, and eligible for cervical cancer screening per national US guidelines, during the time period of September 1, 2022 to August 31, 2025. Aim 1b Inclusion Criteria * women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) receive care * ages between 25- 49 * eligible for cervical cancer screening per national US guidelines Aim 1b

Exclusion criteria

• Women without an intact cervix. Aim 2 Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical team members who work and provide care to women living with HIV at three clinical locations: the Center for Infectious Diseases (CID) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore, MD; Ponce de Leon Clinic at Emory University in Atlanta, GA; and Albany Area Primary Health Care in Albany, GA. * Clinical team members will include: providers (Physicians, Nurse practitioners, Physician's Assistants, Nurses, Nursing Assistants, Medical Assistants, Pharmacists), laboratory members, or other staff involved in clinic operations. Aim 2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of the Cervical Cancer Screening CascadeBaselineThe cervical cancer screening cascade will be documented among screen-eligible patients in Infectious Disease HIV care clinics associated with US-based 'CASCADE' Clinical Sites (CS4 Georgia (GA) and CS8 Maryland (MD)) by constructing a cohort via retrospective chart review.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening and follow-up among women with HIVBaselineThemes identified through semi-structured qualitative interviews assessing women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) receiving care -reported barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening, adherence to follow-up care (including colposcopy and treatment), and perceptions of HPV self-collection approaches to improve screening uptake.
Operational and logistical challenges that affect cervical cancer screening adherence and uptake of HPV self-testingBaseline and 1 month follow upA University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Research Investigator will conduct in-depth interviews and the focus group discussions with clinical providers at Maryland and Georgia Clinical Sites for Aims 1b and 2. In Aim 1a, UNC will receive partially de-identified medical record data from the Clinical Sites to analyze data to evaluate cervical cancer screening cascade completion among women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJennifer S Smith, PhD
jennifers@unc.edu919-966-4432
STUDY_CHAIRJennifer S Smith, PhD

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

STUDY_CHAIRLisa Rahangdale, MD, MPH

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORClement S Adebamowo, ScD

University of Maryland SOM

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGregory Taylor, MD

University of Maryland SOM

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLisa Flowers, MD, MPH

Emory University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnandi Sheth, MD, MSc

Emory University

STUDY_DIRECTORMichael Hudgens, PhD

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

STUDY_DIRECTORKatie Mollan, PhD

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

STUDY_DIRECTORVikrant Sahasrabuddhe, MBBS, MPH, DrPH

Division of Cancer Prevention (DCP), NCI

STUDY_DIRECTORLaura Gaydos, PhD

Emory University

STUDY_DIRECTORPatrick Ryscavage, MD

University of Maryland SOM

STUDY_DIRECTORSue Siminski

Frontier Science Foundation

STUDY_DIRECTORKayla Denson

Frontier Science Foundation

STUDY_DIRECTORNicole Freitag

Frontier Science Foundation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026