Skip to content

One-Time Complete Revascularization Versus Staged PCI in MVD During Pharmaco-Invasive STEMI Strategy

One Time Complete Revascularization Versus Staged PCI in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease During Pharmaco Invasive STEMI Strategy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07519590
Enrollment
112
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
2023-04-30
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Multivessel coronary artery disease, Pharmaco-invasive strategy, Complete revascularization, Staged percutaneous coronary intervention, Fibrinolysis, Non-culprit lesion intervention, Primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay

Brief summary

This study compares two treatment strategies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) undergoing a pharmaco-invasive approach after successful fibrinolysis. The study evaluates whether one-time complete revascularization, in which the culprit and significant non-culprit lesions are treated during the same percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) session, is better than a staged strategy, in which non-culprit lesions are treated in a separate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure within 1 month. The hypothesis is that one-time complete revascularization may reduce hospitalization time, cost, and recurrent ischemic symptoms without increasing short-term complications. Participants are adults with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) who had successful fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes include total hospitalization time, total expenses, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) within 72 hours, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during 3 months of follow-up.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOne-Time Complete Revascularization

Revascularization strategy in which the culprit coronary artery and all significant non-culprit lesions are treated during the index percutaneous coronary intervention session after successful fibrinolysis.

PROCEDUREStaged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Revascularization strategy in which only the culprit coronary artery is treated during the index percutaneous coronary intervention session after successful fibrinolysis, with treatment of significant non-culprit lesions deferred to a separate staged percutaneous coronary intervention within 1 month after discharge.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Helwan University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This was an open-label study. Participants, care providers, and investigators were aware of treatment assignment because the timing and extent of revascularization differed by protocol. No formal masking of outcome assessment was specified.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized in a parallel two-arm design to undergo either one-time complete revascularization during the index percutaneous coronary intervention or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention followed by staged non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention within 1 month after discharge.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults older than 18 years. * Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a pharmaco-invasive strategy. * Successful fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. * Multivessel coronary artery disease. * Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Primary percutaneous coronary intervention. * Unsuccessful fibrinolysis requiring rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. * Candidacy for coronary artery bypass grafting after angiography. * Failed complete revascularization. * Cardiogenic shock. * Single-vessel coronary artery disease treated with a pharmaco-invasive strategy. * Stent thrombosis. * Chronic total occlusion. * Planned percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty to a non-culprit lesion in a vessel smaller than 2.5 millimeters with more than 70 percent stenosis. * Severe valvular heart disease. * Pregnancy. * Prior cardiac surgery. * Congenital heart disease. * Severe hepatic impairment. * Severe renal impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total hospitalization timeup to 1 month post operativelyTotal duration of hospitalization in days. For participants assigned to staged revascularization, the duration of the staged admission was added to the index admission to calculate the total hospitalization time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total expensesup to 1 month post operativelyTotal treatment-related expenses in Egyptian pounds for the index admission and, when applicable, the staged admission.
Contrast-induced nephropathyWithin 72 hours after percutaneous coronary interventionIncrease in serum creatinine by at least 0.5 milligrams per deciliter or at least 25 percent from baseline within 72 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Angina-related hospitalizationWithin 3 months after index percutaneous coronary interventionHospital admission due to recurrent anginal symptoms during follow-up.
Left ventricular ejection fractionBaseline and 3 months after index percutaneous coronary interventionLeft ventricular systolic function assessed by transthoracic echocardiography using the modified Simpson method.
Wall motion score indexBaseline and 3 months after index percutaneous coronary interventionRegional left ventricular wall motion score index assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.
Serum creatinineBaseline, 72 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, and 3 monthsSerum creatinine concentration measured to assess renal function.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026