Skip to content

Optimal Timings of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After ERCP in Patients With Gallstones Along With CBD Stones

Comparative Analysis of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Patients of Cholelithiasis With Choledocholithiasis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07517627
Acronym
ED-LC
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-08
Start date
2025-05-05
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis Associated With Common Bile Duct Stones

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the mean operative time and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP in patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Patients will be randomized into two groups: early cholecystectomy (within 72 hours of ERCP) and delayed cholecystectomy (≥1 month after ERCP). Outcomes include operative time, intra-operative blood loss, hospital stay, and conversion to open cholecystectomy

Detailed description

Gallstones are among the most common surgical problems worldwide, and up to 20% of patients with gallstones also present with stones in the common bile duct. Standard care involves clearance of bile duct stones, typically by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), followed by removal of the gallbladder by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP remains debated. Early LC (within 72 hours) has been associated with fewer recurrent biliary events, reduced hospital stay, and potentially easier operative conditions. However, delayed LC (after one month) continues to be widely practiced due to institutional factors and scheduling constraints. This randomized controlled trial at Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, is designed to evaluate whether early LC after ERCP offers measurable advantages compared with delayed LC. Patients with confirmed cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis will be randomized into two groups: early surgery and delayed surgery. The trial will provide local evidence to guide surgical practice, focusing on operative efficiency and patient recovery. By clarifying the optimal timing of LC after ERCP in our patient population, the study aims to support evidence-based surgical decision-making, improve outcomes, and potentially reduce healthcare costs.

Interventions

Laparoscopic removal of gall bladder within 72hours of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

PROCEDUREDelayed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic removal of gall bladder 2 weeks or more after successful ERCP

Sponsors

Rija Zainab
Lead SponsorOTHER
Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment (Two arms, Early vs Delayed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis based on clinical and radiological findings (right subcostal pain, presence of gallstones, and dilated common bile duct on ultrasound and MRCP) * Age 14 to 70 years * Both males and females * Duration of symptoms less than 3 days * Presence of common bile duct stone with successful clearance on ERCP

Exclusion criteria

* Features suggestive of malignancy on imaging * Patients who develop severe pancreatitis after ERCP

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Operative timeDuring surgeryDuration of surgery measured from the first incision to closure of the last incision.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Hospital StayFrom admission to discharge (up to 30 days)Total number of days from hospital admission to discharge.
Intraoperative Blood LossDuring SurgeryBlood loss measured in milliliters from suction apparatus during surgery.
Conversion to Open CholecystectomyDuring SurgeryNumber of patients requiring conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTDr. Rija Zainab, MS General surgery
rijazainab09@gmail.com+92-304-4050582
CONTACTDr. Muhammad Imran Anwar, FCPS, FRCS
imran_anwar21@hotmail.com+92 300 9442600
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDr. Rija Zainab, MS General surgery

Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 9, 2026