Skip to content

Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated DCBs in ACS Treatment

Comparison Study of Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07514988
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2028-07-01
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate and compare the local inflammatory responses and plaque healing characteristics between sirolimus-coated and paclitaxel-coated coronary drug-coated balloons in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Detailed description

This prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial aims to evaluate and compare the differential effects of sirolimus-coated versus paclitaxel-coated drug-coated balloons (DCBs) on local inflammatory responses and plaque healing characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Interventions

DEVICESirolimus-coated DCB

Treatment of sirolimus-coated DCB

DEVICEPaclitaxel-coated DCB

Treatment of paclitaxel-coated DCB

Sponsors

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled: 1. Age between 18 and 80 years old, both genders eligible; 2. Coronary angiography showing non-complex lesions with acute coronary syndrome (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina) deemed suitable for drug-coated balloon treatment by the investigator; 3. Visually estimated lesion length ≤28mm, visually estimated vessel diameter ≥2.5mm and ≤3.0mm; 4. Successful lesion pre-dilation (must simultaneously meet all 3 criteria: no Type C or greater dissection; TIMI flow grade 3; visually estimated residual stenosis ≤30%); 5. Able to understand the study purpose, willing to complete follow-up visits, and voluntarily provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. Total occlusion (TIMI 0 flow) lesion; 2. In-stent restenosis lesion; 3. Concurrent left main disease or severe three-vessel disease requiring coronary artery bypass grafting; 4. Target lesion with severe calcification or tortuosity that cannot be crossed by guidewire; 5. Coronary artery bypass graft stenosis; 6. Confirmed ST-elevation myocardial infarction; 7. Cardiogenic shock or requiring mechanical respiratory and circulatory support; 8. Hemodynamically unstable tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia; 9. Severe renal insufficiency or undergoing hemodialysis; 10. Known allergy or intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, heparin, contrast media, paclitaxel, sirolimus and/or other analogues; 11. Systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases; 12. History of stroke within 6 months prior to enrollment; 13. Scheduled elective surgery within 6 months after enrollment requiring discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications; 14. Currently participating in other drug or interventional medical device clinical studies; 15. Other conditions deemed unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Optical coherence tomography assessment of target lesion healing and repair at 3-month follow-up after the procedure3 monthsOCT assessment of target lesion healing based on three morphological criteria: fibrous cap thickness (FCT), maximum lipid arc, and macrophage infiltration. Target lesion is defined as unhealed if any of the following criteria are met: (1) FCT \<75μm, (2) maximum lipid arc \>180°, or (3) presence of macrophage infiltration. Target lesion is defined as healed only if all three criteria are met: (1) FCT ≥75μm; (2) maximum lipid arc ≤180°; (3) absence of macrophage infiltration. The primary outcome is reported as the proportion of patients with healed target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OCT-measured minimum lumen area change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in minimum lumen area (MLA) measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm².
OCT-measured fibrous cap thickness change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in fibrous cap thickness (FCT) measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: μm.
OCT-measured maximum lipid arc change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in maximum lipid arc measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: degrees.
OCT assessment of macrophage infiltration change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in macrophage infiltration presence and characteristics assessed by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure.
OCT-measured thin-cap fibroatheroma count change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in number of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) lesions measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. TCFA defined as lipid-rich plaque with fibrous cap thickness \<65μm. Unit: count.
OCT-measured lipid pool length change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in lipid pool length measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm.
OCT assessment of microchannel change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in microchannel presence and characteristics assessed by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure.
OCT-measured minimum lumen diameter change at 3 months post-procedure3 monthsChange in minimum lumen diameter measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm.
CCTA-measured perivascular fat attenuation index change at 6 months6 monthsChange in perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. FAI is defined as the mean CT attenuation value of perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the coronary artery. Unit: Hounsfield Units (HU).
CCTA-measured low-attenuation plaque volume change at 6 months post-procedure6 monthsChange in low-attenuation plaque volume measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. Low-attenuation plaque is defined as plaque with CT value \<30 HU. Unit: mm³.
CCTA-measured plaque burden change at 6 months post-procedure6 monthsChange in plaque burden measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. Plaque burden is calculated as plaque volume divided by total vessel volume multiplied by 100%. Unit: percentage (%).
Incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) at 6 months post-procedure6 monthsTarget lesion failure (TLF) was defined as a composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Incidence of patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) at 6 months post-procedure6 monthsPatient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTJie Zhao, MD, PhD
fwzhaojie@126.com+8613911036089
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJie Zhao, MD, PhD

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026