Skip to content

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Staging Versus Staging Laparotomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Staging Versus Staging Laparotomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07514078
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2027-01-20
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

laparscopic staging in endometrial cancer

Brief summary

Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy is associated with faster recovery, better visualization, shorter hospital stays, and less possible adhesion formation. But do the safety, efficacy, and morbidity of laparoscopic staging differ from conventional staging laparotomy in endometrial cancer?Is laparoscopic staging considered a safe and effective alternative procedure for the surgical treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma? This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, and morbidity between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with lymphadenectomy and conventional staging laparotomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Detailed description

Primary Outcome: perioperative morbidities: 1. intraoperative complications like bladder injury, ureteric injury, vascular injury & bowel injury. 2. Early postoperative complications like paralytic ileus, postoperative fever ((defined as a temperature higher than 38 c on two consecutive postoperative days or higher than 39 c on any postoperative day). Secondary outcomes: 1. Amount of blood loss by allowable blood loss formula between conventional staging laparotomy and laparoscopic staging & need for blood transfusion. (ABL = weight kg \* age sex factor (65ml/ kg) \*initial HGB(g/dl)-final HGB(g/dl) / initial HGB (g/dl) (Jaramillo, 2019). 2. oncological outcomes (one-year survival rate, need for adjuvant chemo or radiotherapy, recurrent rate after one year) indicate radical malignancy elimination. 3. Operation time from skin to skin in hours. 4. ICU admission. 5. Wound infection. 6. Hospital stays in days. 7. A post-operative pain person rates their pain on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero means "no pain," and 10 means "the worst possible pain. Laparoscopic surgical staging operation is a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for the management of endometrial cancer especially lymphadenectomy with acceptable morbidity and radical treatment to the malignancy compared to the laparotomy.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparscopic staging

staging laparotomy

Sponsors

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Inclusion Criteria: I. Patient histopathological diagnosed early-stage endometrial carcinoma, (stages 1A \&1B) according to FIGO classification. • \-

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome: perioperative morbidities. intraoperative complications like bladder, ureteric, or intestinal injury6 monthsPrimary Outcome: perioperative morbidities: . intraoperative complications like bladder, ureteric, or intestinal injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary outcomes: 1. Amount of blood loss by the allowable blood loss formula6 monthsSecondary outcomes: Amount of blood loss by allowable blood loss formula between conventional staging laparotomy and laparoscopic staging \& need for blood transfusion. (ABL = weight kg \* age sex factor (65ml/ kg) \*initial HGB(g/dl)-final HGB(g/dl) / initial HGB (g/dl) (Jaramillo, 2019).

Contacts

CONTACTsara abdelrazik sara hamad, assistant lecture
hamadsara358@gmail.con+2001092762108
CONTACTmohamed nader nader, lecture
+2001002745161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026