Skip to content

The Assessment of Partial Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Down Titration in Heart Failure in Remission.

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Pilot Trial Investigating the Partial Down-titration of Guideline-directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure in Remission.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07513883
Acronym
TAPERED-HF
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
2026-03-16
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart failure in remission, Heart failure improvement, Guideline-recommended medical therapy, Heart failure recovery, Therapy withdrawal, Heart failure treatment

Brief summary

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that is characterized by a weakened and enlarged heart. It typically causes symptoms such as breathlessness and swelling of the legs, and it is a serious illness that shortens life expectancy. In recent years, new medicines have been developed that can improve heart function and help patients with HF live longer. HF patients with reduced heart function typically are recommended to take four different medicines for the rest of their lives. Some patients respond so well to treatment that their heart function and symptoms appear to recover; this is called HF in remission. While the four standard medicines have proven to increase lifespan in patients with heart failure with reduced heart function, it is not known whether they all need to be continued lifelong after recovery of the heart. Current guidelines recommend treating patients lifelong, yet this is based on limited scientific evidence. Lifelong therapy comes with disadvantages: it carries considerable costs for patients and health care systems, causes potential side effects, and makes it harder for patients to keep up with all their other medications. This study will test whether carefully reducing certain HF medicines is safe compared to continuing them. Patients with heart failure in remission will be randomly assigned to either: (1) continue all standard therapies, or (2) gradually reduce medicines to just two per day under close medical supervision. Patients will followed for two years to see whether their heart function remains stable. This will be measured by looking at echograms of the heart (echocardiograms), blood tests, and whether patients experience serious events such as hospitalizations or death. This study will investigate whether partial therapy discontinuation is safe and feasible.

Interventions

DRUGDown-titration

The intervention involves a 3-month therapy down-titration period, during which the SGLT2 inhibitor and minerolocorticoid receptor antagonist are withdrawn, and the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor is replaced by an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. The drug formulations used per drug class correspond with the ESC guideline recommendations: * ACE inhibitor: enalapril, lisinopril, ramipril, captopril or trandolapril (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC). * ARB (second line alternative to ACEi): valsartan, losartan or candesartan (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC). * Beta blocker: carvedilol, metroprolol, bisoprolol or nebivolol (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC).

DRUGContinuation of guideline-directed heart failure therapy

The comparator involves the continuation of the maximally tolerated dose of guideline-recommended medical therapy (e.g., ACEi/ARB/ARNI, MRA, SGLT2i, and/or beta blocker) the patient is using at the time of screening. The formulations per drug class may differ according to treatment regimen at randomization, but may include: * ARNI: sacubitril/valsartan (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC) * ACE inhibitor: enalapril, lisinopril, ramipril, captopril or trandolapril (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC). * ARB: valsartan, losartan or candesartan (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC). * Beta blocker: carvedilol, metroprolol, bisoprolol or nebivolol (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the respective drug SmPC). * SGLT2 inhibitor: dapagliflozin or empagliflozin at 10 mg per day. * MRA: spironolactone or eplerenone (at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the SmPC).

Sponsors

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The LVESVi endpoint will be assessed by a core echocardiography laboratory, blinded to treatment arm assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed and dated written informed consent prior to randomization * Age ≥ 18 years * Prior diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40%) * Heart failure remission (defined as a quantified improvement in LVEF to ≥50% or described as a "normalized" or "recovered" LVEF on echocardiography or cardiac MRI at least 6 months prior; a normal LVESVi and LVEF during screening; no residual functional limitations caused by heart failure; a NT-proBNP \< 250 pg/mL during screening) * Treatment with at least three heart failure therapies (ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors), consistent with international heart failure guidelines, at maximally tolerated dose and stable for at least 6 months before screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe kidney disease: chronic kidney disease with significant albuminuria, defined as an eGFR (creatinine or cystatin C-based using the 2021 CKD-EPI formula) \< 60 mL/min/1,73m2 and a urine-albumine creatinine ratio ≥ 200 mg/g, or requiring dialysis, or a history of kidney transplantation. * Recent major cardiovascular events, including acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery bypass surgery, stroke, or TIA, in the 90 days before screening. * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure above 160 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure above 100 mmHg despite three antihypertensive agents, assessed during a 24-hour blood pressure measurement during screening. * Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with a resting heart rate \> 110 beats per minute during screening * Suboptimal biventricular pacing in those treated with cardiac synchronization therapy, defined as a biventricular pacing percentage under 98% during screening. * Any concomitant current or future class I indication for the use SGLT2i beside heart failure: diabetes mellitus type II with ASCVD, or at least two major risk factors (i.e., obesity, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia or albuminuria) during screening. * Any sustained ventricular arrhythmias in the six months before screening. * Any untreated valvular heart disease of moderate or greater severity during screening. * Presence of any other disease with a life expectancy of less than two years. * Pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first occurrence of recurrent adverse remodeling, significant NT-proBNP increase or all-cause mortality.From enrollment to 2 year follow-upThe primary outcome is a composite of (1) adverse remodeling, defined as an LVESVi increase of more than 20% from baseline using echocardiography, (2) a significant biomarker increase, defined as an NT-proBNP increase to more than 500 pg/mL, or (3) all-cause mortality.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first occurrence of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalizationsFrom enrollment to 2 year follow-up
Change in quality of lifeFrom enrollment to 2 year follow-upMeasured as the change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 score. It provides a 0-100 summary score (higher is better) assessing physical limitations, symptom frequency, social limitations, and quality of life. A 5-point difference is clinically significant, with 75-100 indicating good health.
Proportion of patients requiring heart failure therapy re-initiation or intensification for any reasonFrom enrollment to 2 year follow-up

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026