Inguinal Hernia Repair
Conditions
Keywords
inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, laryngeal mask airway
Brief summary
Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions requiring surgical intervention in childhood, with a reported lifetime prevalence of 1-4%. With the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques such as PIRS (Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing) among laparoscopic surgical procedures, perioperative anesthesia and airway management have become a critical area of clinical decision-making. The traditional approach in pediatric laparoscopic surgery is endotracheal intubation (ETT). Although ETT provides reliable airway control, it carries certain disadvantages. In contrast, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is less invasive and is associated with faster recovery. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted in recent years have shown that the LMA may be safe for ventilation in pediatric laparoscopy, reduces peak airway pressure, and shortens recovery time. No well-designed, multicenter study with an adequate sample size comparing the LMA and ETT in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery has yet been conducted. This gap limits evidence-based decision-making in a clinical setting that directly impacts practice. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare LMA and ETT in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In this regard, the study is unique and necessary from both clinical and academic perspectives for determining the optimal airway strategy in pediatric laparoscopy.
Detailed description
This study is designed as a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial to compare laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation (ETT) in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Interventions
PROCEDUREGeneral Aneasthesia
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal intubation (ETT) in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Sponsors
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Mardin Training and Research Hospital
Dicle University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* being between 1 and 10 years of age, * having a planned laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, * being classified as ASA I-II, * having given informed consent from the parent.
Exclusion criteria
* Obesity (body weight \>95th percentile), * symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux, * high risk of aspiration, * upper airway anomalies, * history of difficult intubation, * acute respiratory tract infection, * emergency surgical indication, * need for conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery, * presence of additional systemic risks such as immunodeficiency/malignancy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Saturation | perioperative period | Patients' oxygen saturation levels will be monitored using peripheral spO2. |
| end-tidal carbondioxide levels | perioperative period | Patients' end-tidal CO2 levels will be monitored using capnography. |
| airway safety | perioperative period | The development and management of complications related to airway safety (such as laryngospasm, bronchospasm, desaturation, and aspiration) in patients will be monitored. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| peak airway pressure | perioperative period |
| PACU duration | postoperative period |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
CONTACTFikret Salık, associate professor
Outcome results
None listed