Skip to content

Simultaneous vs. Postponed Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) During Distal Radius Fracture (DRF) Fixation.

Cons and Pros of Concomitant Carpal Tunnel Release During Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07509437
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-04-03
Start date
2023-02-25
Completion date
2026-02-15
Last updated
2026-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Brief summary

This randomized study evaluates the impact of performing a prophylactic carpal tunnel release (CTR) at the same time as surgical fixation for a distal radius fracture (DRF). The study compares this simultaneous approach against a postponed approach (observing and only performing CTR if symptoms develop) to determine which strategy better reduces the frequency of re-operation and improves functional outcomes.

Interventions

During the internal fixation of the fracture via the Henry approach, the incision is extended distally into the palm. The transverse carpal ligament is incised to decompress the median nerve at the same time the bone is fixed.

PROCEDUREDistal Radius Fracture Fixation with Observation.

Standard operative procedure for the fracture fixation only. Patients are monitored during follow-up; those who subsequently develop median nerve compression symptoms are then prepared for an elective CTR in a separate surgical setting.

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Both the investigators and the participants are aware of which arm the patient has been assigned to.

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to one of two distinct groups (arms) simultaneously. Each group follows a specific protocol throughout the study duration to allow for a direct head-to-head comparison of outcomes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with trauma to the lower end of the radius requiring surgical intervention. * Fractures classified as AO/OTA classes involving significant displacement, articular surface depression, or comminution (excluding simple A-C1 classes).

Exclusion criteria

* Simple fractures (AO/OTA class A-C1) suitable for non-operative management. * Pre-existing neurocognitive or psychological disorders. * Refusal to participate or sign written consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Symptomatic Carpal Tunnel SyndromeFrom surgery through the completion of fracture healing (4-6 wks)The number of patients who develop symptomatic median nerve compression requiring medical or surgical intervention after the initial fracture correction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Functional Status of the Upper Extremity.5-10 weeksThis tool uses 11 items to measure the degree of difficulty a patient has performing specific physical activities (6 items) and the impact of symptoms like pain and numbness on social activities, work, and sleep (5 items). * Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. * The total score is transformed into a percentage (0-100%), where a higher percentage indicates more severe disability and greater difficulty in daily functioning.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohammed Shibl Zaki, MD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026