Skip to content

High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM) Biofeedback

Assessing the Impact of Biofeedback on Task Performance With Swallowing Maneuvers in Healthy Young Adults Using High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07508059
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-04-02
Start date
2026-08-19
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Swallow

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to quantify the added benefit of visual biofeedback from High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM) for swallowing rehabilitation. Primary aims including assessing changes in swallowing biomechanics (pressure generation, timing) during swallow maneuvers with and without HRPM visual biofeedback. Secondary aim includes participant attitudes related to visual biofeedback and the experience of HRPM.

Interventions

OTHERSwallowing Maneuvers

Swallows will include 5 regular-effort saliva swallows (+/- visual biofeedback), 5 effortful saliva swallows (+/- visual biofeedback), 5 mendelsohn maneuver swallows (+/- visual biofeedback), and 5 masako or tongue hold maneuver swallows (+/- visual biofeedback).

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHigh Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM)

A diagnostic tool using a catheter with closely spaced sensors to measure pressures and timing within the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during swallowing

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants must be independent community dwelling adults. 2. Participants must be between the ages of 18-40 years old. 3. Willingness to consent and participate in the study procedures. 4. No reported dysphagia or difficulty swallowing evidenced by an EAT-10 Score \<3.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known structural or neurological causes of dysphagia (e.g., stroke, brain injury, or head/neck cancer). 2. Recent or remote history of swallowing therapy; familiarity with swallowing maneuvers from relevant coursework as applicable (i.e., speech language pathology students).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pharyngeal contractile integral (PhCI) (mmHg) with and without visual biofeedback via HRPMBaseline (without HRPM), with HRPM (up to 2 minutes)Pharyngeal contractile integral, a product of mean pharyngeal contractile amplitude, length, and duration. Low PhCI (\< 100-150 mmHg·s·cm): Indicates hypo-contractility or weakness while High PhCI (\> 200-300+ mmHg·s·cm): Represents stronger contraction strength
Change in pharyngoesophageal Segment (PES) opening duration (ms) with and without visual biofeedback via HRPMBaseline (without HRPM), with HRPM (up to 2 minutes)Measures the duration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) opening in milliseconds. Short Duration (\<300ms) correlates with upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction, reduced laryngeal elevation, and poor pharyngeal contraction.
Change in PES pressure with visual biofeedback via HRPM with and without visual biofeedback via HRPMBaseline (without HRPM), with HRPM (up to 2 minutes)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSonja Molfenter
Smm16@nyu.edu212-992-7694
CONTACTClaire Crossman
Cmc9512@nyu.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSonja Molfenter

NYU Langone Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026