Skip to content

The Benefits of a Care Pathway Combining Remote Monitoring and Support From a Nurse After a Change in Anti-epileptic Treatment: a Pilot Study

The Benefits of a New Care Pathway Combining Remote Monitoring and Support From a Nurse for Epileptic Patients After a Change in Anti-epileptic Treatment: a Pilot Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07507240
Acronym
EPISUR
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-04-02
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2028-05-01
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

epilepsy, remote monitoring, epilepsy treatment

Brief summary

Epilepsy is a chronic condition affecting approximately 600,000 people in France. Epilepsy treatment relies on antiepileptic drugs, the effectiveness of which depends on adherence to medication schedule, with missed doses increasing the risk of seizures. As with any chronic illness, epilepsy presents a significant challenge in terms of treatment adherence. Furthermore, despite good medication adherence, 30% of patients remain drug-resistant. Therefore, the aim is to create a remote monitoring program, supported by a nurse, lasting six months after the introduction of a new antiepileptic drug, to support the patient until their next appointment with a neurologist. This system would optimize and secure the care pathway during treatment changes by improving the detection of side effects and/or a resurgence of seizures requiring medication adjustments.

Interventions

OTHERRemote monitoring training

Training in the care pathway via remote monitoring software

OTHERDescription of the standard care pathway

Description of the standard care pathway with the nurse

OTHERTherapeutic support with a nurse

Therapeutic support with a nurse who ensures the patient's adherence to remote monitoring at 1 month and 3 months

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTQuestionnaires for the two groups

Quality of life questionnaires at baseline and at 6 months

OTHERSatisfaction questionnaire for the group with remote monitoring

Satisfaction questionnaire for the group with remote monitoring at 6 months

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy by a neurologist * Patient requiring the introduction of anti-epileptic medication as an add-on to their usual treatment or as a replacement for their current treatment(s) * Access to a reliable internet connection and a compatible device for remote monitoring (smartphone, tablet, computer) * Ability to understand and use remote communication technologies

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of concurrent neurological or psychiatric disorders affecting the ability to use remote monitoring. * Presence of a progressive neurological disease, including degenerative CNS disease, or a progressive tumor. * Change in treatment for pregnancy preparation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Describe the evolution of therapeutic adherence6 months after the inclusionMeasurement of the Mascard scale score in 2 groups of patients benefiting or not from the new care and support pathway.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evolution of Quality of Life between baseline and 6 months6 months after the inclusionEvolution of the score on the QOLIE 31 quality of life scale between the beginning and the end of the course between 2 groups
Description of the care pathway between baseline and 6 months6 months after the inclusionDescription of the number of consultations in both groups between baseline and 6 months
Description of patient satisfaction with their medical care6 months after the inclusionPatient satisfaction score on epilepsy care questionnaire
Evaluation of patient acceptability of remote monitoring6 months after the inclusionPatient satisfaction questionnaire score regarding the use of the digital tool for the group of patients who received care via remote monitoring
Evaluation of satisfaction with the use of remote monitoring by the healthcare team6 months after the inclusionScore on the satisfaction questionnaire regarding the use of remote monitoring by the care team,

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTMarie DENUELLE, MD
denuelle.m@chu-toulouse.fr05 61 77 94 24

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026