Skip to content

Efficacy of Lecanemab at Different Therapeutic Doses for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in Real-World Practice

Efficacy of Lecanemab at Different Therapeutic Doses for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in Real-World Practice

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07505095
Enrollment
140
Registered
2026-04-01
Start date
2026-04-30
Completion date
2028-01-31
Last updated
2026-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Dementia, Alzheimer Disease (AD), MCI-AD, Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's Disease, lecanemab, different doses

Brief summary

This study will analyze the clinical indicators, imaging data, and serum biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients receiving different doses of the medication before and after treatment. It aims to clarify whether the therapeutic efficacy in the low-dose group is equivalent to that in the recommended-dose group, and meanwhile to determine the optimal dose range for effective pharmacotherapy.

Interventions

Lecanemab Injection Concentrate Solution (active ingredient at 100 mg/mL) is provided as a sterile aqueous solution containing 100 mg/mL of Lecanemab, 50 mmol/L citric acid, 350 mmol/L arginine/arginine hydrochloride, and 0.05% (w/v) polysorbate 80, with a pH of 5.0, and each vial is capable of being drawn into a volume of 5 mL.

DRUGLecanemab 5-10mg/kg

Lecanemab Injection Concentrate Solution 5-10mg/kg, the dose based on the actual dosage administered to patients in the real-world setting

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet the diagnostic criteria for AD-derived MCI or early AD \[Clinical rating: CDR 0.5 (MCI) / 1.0 (mild AD), i.e., clinical stage 3-5; PIB-PET positive for pathology\] * Male or female * 50-85 years old * Not currently participating in other research studies * Volunteers must provide written informed consent prior to study participation and voluntarily sign the informed consent form * Volunteers are able to communicate effectively with investigators and comply with study procedures to complete the study

Exclusion criteria

* Other neurological disorders: e.g., vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, prion diseases, etc. * Systemic diseases or metabolic disorders: e.g., hypothyroidism, vitamin B12 deficiency, hepatic and renal failure. * Infectious diseases: e.g., neurosyphilis, HIV-associated encephalopathy, and other infectious diseases. * Psychiatric disorders: cognitive symptoms caused by severe depression (pseudodementia), schizophrenia, etc. * Effects of drugs/toxins: long-term use of benzodiazepines, anticholinergic drugs, or alcohol dependence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aβ-PET centiloid valuesBaseline, 18 monthsStatistical Comparison of Standard-Dose Treatment Group and Low-Dose Treatment Group Based on Aβ-PET Centiloid Scores

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) at 18 MonthsBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsAssessment of the Statistical Difference in CDR Scores Between Standard-Dose Treatment Group and Low-Dose Treatment Group
Change from Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at 18 MonthsBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsAssessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MMSE Scores Between Standard-Dose Treatment Group and Low-Dose Treatment Group
Change from Baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at 18 MonthsBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsAssessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MoCA Scores Between Standard-Dose Treatment Group and Low-Dose Treatment Group
Change from Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at 18 MonthsBaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsAssessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in NPI Scores Between Standard-Dose Treatment Group and Low-Dose Treatment Group

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTJiong Zhou
ze-zj@zju.edu.cn13958125492
CONTACTYaping Yan
yanyaping@zju.edu.cn+86 151 6831 2676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026