Skip to content

Surgical Glove Compression to Prevent Paclitaxel Neuropathy

Comparison of Surgical Glove Compressions as a Prophylactic Method to Prevent Paclitaxel-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07504770
Acronym
Surgical Glove
Enrollment
84
Registered
2026-04-01
Start date
2026-03-26
Completion date
2027-03-26
Last updated
2026-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Surgical Glove

Keywords

Surgical Glove, Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of surgical glove compression as a prophylactic method to prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving standard care, and the other receiving prophylactic surgical glove compression. The study will compare the development, severity of neuropathy in the hands and fingers, and its impact on quality of life.

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical glove compression to prevent peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving paclitaxel. Participants will be divided into two groups: one receiving standard care, and the other receiving glove compression. The study will compare the development and severity of neuropathy in the hands and fingers, as well as its impact on quality of life. This method is considered a practical, cost-effective, and well-tolerated preventive approach. Method: Patients receiving paclitaxel will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Intervention Group 1: Each patient will wear a standard surgical glove (½ size smaller) on the same hand for all treatment sessions. Since surgeons typically use gloves that fit their hands perfectly, a standard-sized surgical glove is defined as a "surgeon fit." Gloves will be worn 30 minutes before paclitaxel infusion, during the infusion, and 30 minutes after the infusion. This procedure will be repeated at every treatment session. No additional interventions will be applied. Gloves must fit the patient's hands properly. The study nurse will determine the appropriate glove size for each patient by measuring from the base of the palm to the tip of the middle finger. The measurements will be converted to glove sizes using a reference table. Intervention Group 2: Each patient will wear two standard surgical gloves on the same hand: the first ½ size smaller and the second one size smaller. Gloves will be worn 30 minutes before paclitaxel infusion, during the infusion, and 30 minutes after. This procedure will be repeated at every treatment session. No additional interventions will be applied. Gloves must fit the patient's hands properly. The study nurse will determine the appropriate glove size for each patient. Control Group: Patients in the control group will receive standard clinical care only, without any additional interventions. Widespread Effect If effective, surgical glove compression could provide a simple, low-cost, and widely accessible method to prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy, improving quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy and potentially influencing supportive care practices in oncology settings.

Interventions

OTHERSurgical glove compression during paclitaxel infusion

n the intervention group, each patient will wear two standard surgical gloves on the same single hand throughout the study (the first glove will be half a size smaller, the second glove one size smaller). The gloves will be worn 30 minutes before the paclitaxel infusion, during the infusion, and for 30 minutes after the infusion. This procedure will be performed each time the patient comes for treatment. No additional interventions will be applied besides the surgical gloves. The gloves must fit the patients' hands properly, and the study nurse will determine the appropriate glove size for each patient.

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

In addition to participants and study staff, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group assignments to minimize bias in evaluating peripheral neuropathy and quality of life outcomes.

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 80 years * Diagnosed with Stage II-III breast cancer * No distant metastasis * Planned to receive adjuvant or neoadjuvant paclitaxel for at least 12 weeks * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 Karnofsky ≥ 60%)

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent breast cancer * Prior treatment associated with neuropathy (e.g., taxanes, platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-tubulin or proteasome inhibitors)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool (CIPNAT)4 weeks after the first assessmentThe first section assesses the nine main symptoms as well as their severity, the extent to which they cause emotional disruption, and the frequency of their occurrence. The first six items in this section are related to sensory symptoms, while the seventh, eighth and ninth items are related to sub-dimensions of motor symptoms. In the second part, 14 activities were evaluated and questions were asked about the effect level of these substances. The activities assessed included fine motor and general activities. To assess the symptoms listed in the first section, "Yes" was considered equal to 1 point and "No" equal to 0 (0-9); their severity, symptoms, extent and frequency of emotional impairment were scored between 0 and 10 (0-270). The total score for the first part of the instrument is between 0 and 279. The effect level on the 14 activities in the second part was calculated between 0 and 10 (0-140). The Cronbach's alpha value of the original scale is 0.95

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTDeniz Özdemir, Phd
dnzzzzdmr@gmail.com+905066087130
CONTACTSelda Arslan, Associate Professor
seldayarali@hotmail.com+905439253200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 18, 2026