Muscle Health Measurements Using Electrical Impedance Myography

Myopathy, Muscular Dystrophies, Myositis, Myofibrillar Myopathy, Congenital Myopathy, Distal Myopathy, Myopathies

Muscle Health, Myopathy, Device, Healthy control, MRI, Electrical Impedance Myography, EIM

This study is being done to further develop a device, the mScan, to measure muscle health as compared to measurements of muscle health using MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). This device is held against the skin and uses Electrical Impedance Myography (EIM). EIM uses a very small, noninvasive (e.g. no needles), brief (about 6 seconds), and painless electrical current to measure the muscle. The investigators will look at how the mScan predicts the muscle measurements seen on MRI in people with and without muscle disease. The investigators hope that this can be used in the future as a quick, convenient and less time-consuming way than MRI to assess muscle health. This could be used to measure how well treatments for different muscle disorders are working over a period of time.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important clinical tool for tracking skeletal muscle disease and response to therapy in a variety of conditions ranging from muscular dystrophy to myositis. MRI can serve as a surrogate measure of skeletal muscle pathology; it can quantify atrophy, edema, fatty infiltration, and myofiber disorganization, obviating the need for biopsy. There is little question that tracking MRI changes will speed therapeutic clinical trials in many muscle diseases; its use has been strongly encouraged. Although MRI can provide excellent assessment of muscle condition, MRI has many drawbacks including high cost, general inconvenience, need for the subject to lie flat without moving, limited evaluation of upper extremity muscles, need for detailed image analysis to distill complex imaging data down to a simple value for disease tracking, difficulty obtaining repeated measurements in a clinical trial, and challenges in standardization of protocols across institutions. These limitations prevent MRI from being an easily applied biomarker for assessment of muscle health and disease status. A technology that offers compositional information similar to MRI but that overcomes MRI's many drawbacks could serve as an extraordinary powerful biomarker in regular patient care and clinical therapeutic trials. Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is such a technology. In fact, EIM is currently being used as biomarker in a number of neuromuscular disorders. In EIM, using a small handheld device, a weak, directionally focused, multi-frequency electrical current is applied to a muscle, resulting surface voltages are measured, and impedance values are derived. Alterations in these values provide insight into the condition of muscle, including atrophy, edema, fatty infiltration, and myofiber disorganization. In addition to ALS, EIM has already shown considerable value as a biomarker in a number of disorders including muscular dystrophy, myositis, and simple deconditioning. In sum, the investigators hypothesize that EIM has the potential to serve as a proxy for MRI, providing much of the same information but with far greater speed and convenience, lower cost, smaller size, greater flexibility and tolerability and without the need for cumbersome image analysis. While much data has been acquired showing EIM is sensitive to muscle health, there is only sparse data relating EIM directly to MRI. Given the complexity of both EIM and MRI, applying machine learning approaches to these data sets can serve as a means for establishing a relationship between these two technologies. This would allow EIM to serve as an extremely convenient tool for tracking muscle health and potentially as a biomarker in future clinical therapeutic trials and day-to-day patient care. Research Question: Can EIM supplement and potentially substitute for MRI in the assessment of primary diseases of skeletal muscle (myopathies)?

No related papers found yet.

United States