Skip to content

Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography for Non-Invasive Estimation of Blood Glucose and HbA1c

Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography for Non-Invasive Estimation of Blood Glucose and HbA1c in a Community-Based Population in Jakarta

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07502690
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-03-31
Start date
2026-03-23
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycaemia (Diabetic), Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Hypoglycaemia

Keywords

remote photoplethysmography, rppg, blood glucose, HbA1c, diabetes mellitus, non-invasive monitoring, digital health screening

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether a non-invasive facial scan technology using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) can accurately estimate blood glucose and HbA1c levels in adults living in the community in Jakarta. The study focuses on adults aged 18 years and older, including individuals with or without diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can rPPG-based facial scan estimates of blood glucose and HbA1c match results from standard laboratory blood tests? 2. How well can rPPG identify individuals with high blood sugar or diabetes risk based on established clinical cut-off values? Researchers will compare results from the rPPG facial scan with standard laboratory measurements of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c to determine how accurate and reliable the technology is for screening purposes. Participants will: 1. Provide basic information such as age, sex, and medical history 2. Undergo a non-invasive facial scan using a smartphone-based system 3. Have a blood sample taken to measure fasting blood glucose and HbA1c 4. Complete all assessments during a single study visit This study aims to determine whether rPPG can serve as a simple, non-invasive, and accessible tool for early detection and monitoring of diabetes in community settings.

Detailed description

Introduction Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents a major global health burden characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and associated complications. Standard monitoring methods, such as fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), rely on invasive blood sampling and access to laboratory facilities, which may reduce patient adherence and limit early detection. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), a non-contact optical technique using facial video analysis, has emerged as a promising alternative for estimating physiological and metabolic parameters. However, evidence regarding its validity in assessing glycemic markers remains limited . Objective This study aims to evaluate the validity and diagnostic performance of rPPG-based facial scan technology in estimating blood glucose and HbA1c levels compared with standard laboratory measurements. Methods This study employs an analytical observational design with a cross-sectional diagnostic validation approach conducted in Kelurahan Semanan, Jakarta. A total of 150-300 adult participants will be recruited using a community-based sampling method. Each participant will undergo venous blood sampling for laboratory measurement of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, alongside a non-contact rPPG facial scan using a smartphone-based system. Agreement between methods will be assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, while correlation analysis (Pearson/Spearman) will evaluate the strength of association. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity and specificity, will be calculated using clinical cut-offs (≥126 mg/dL for glucose and ≥6.5% for HbA1c). Expected Results It is expected that rPPG-derived estimates will demonstrate moderate to good correlation with laboratory measurements, with acceptable agreement for screening purposes. The technology is anticipated to show reasonable diagnostic performance in identifying individuals with high glycemic risk. These findings may support the feasibility of rPPG as a non-invasive, accessible screening tool for diabetes monitoring in community settings.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tarumanagara University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Universitas Tarumanagara
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged ≥18 years 2. Willing to participate and provide informed consent 3. Able to undergo facial scan and blood examination 4. Stable clinical condition

Exclusion criteria

1. Facial conditions interfering with rPPG signal (e.g., wounds, deformities) 2. Use of facial coverings obstructing camera detection 3. Inability to remain still during facial scan 4. Incomplete data or withdrawal from study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement Between rPPG-Derived and Laboratory Blood GlucoseSingle assessment at baseline (during study visit)Assessment of agreement between blood glucose values obtained from remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) facial scan and standard laboratory fasting blood glucose measurements using Bland-Altman analysis, including mean bias and limits of agreement.
Agreement Between rPPG-Derived and Laboratory HbA1cSingle assessment at baseline (during study visit)Evaluation of agreement between HbA1c values estimated using rPPG facial scan and laboratory HbA1c measurements using Bland-Altman analysis, including bias and limits of agreement.
Correlation and Validation of rPPG Estimates with Laboratory Blood Glucose and HbA1cSingle assessment at baseline (during study visit)Measurement of the strength of association between rPPG-derived and laboratory-measured blood glucose and HbA1c values using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients (Bland Altman)
Diagnostic Performance of rPPG for Detecting Hyperglycemia and Diabetes RiskSingle assessment at baseline (during study visit)Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of rPPG-derived blood glucose (≥126 mg/dL) and HbA1c (≥6.5%) in identifying individuals with elevated glycemic levels compared to laboratory reference standards.

Countries

Indonesia

Contacts

CONTACTAlexander Halim Santoso
alexanders@fk.untar.ac.id+6281381606869
CONTACTErnawati Ernawati, Dr.
ernawati@fk.untar.ac.id
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYohanes Firmansyah, MD

Klinik Citra Semanan

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORErnawati Ernawati

Universitas Tarumanagara

STUDY_DIRECTORAlexander Halim Santoso

Universitas Tarumanagara

STUDY_CHAIRSri Tiarti

Universitas Tarumanagara

STUDY_CHAIRNoer Saelan Tadjudin

Universitas Tarumanagara

STUDY_CHAIRPutu Tommy Yudha Sumatera Suyasa

Universitas Tarumanagara

STUDY_DIRECTORDavid Wongso

DexWellness

STUDY_DIRECTORRatheesh Nair

Watch Your Health

STUDY_DIRECTORKieren Nathan Wong

Monash University

STUDY_DIRECTORJaydee Kirani Wong

Melbourne University

STUDY_CHAIRMeiske Yunithree Suparman

Universitas Tarumanagara

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026