Skip to content

The Impact of Technology-supported Interactive Teaching in Ethics Education

The Impact of Technology-supported Interactive Teaching in Ethics Education on Nursing Students' Ethical Sensitivity and Ethical Decision-making Levels. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07502079
Enrollment
142
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2026-05-14
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ethical Dilemma, Ethics, Nursing, Nursing Student, Professional Ethics

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of technology-supported interactive teaching in ethics education on nursing students' ethical sensitivity and ethical decision-making levels.

Detailed description

Students selected for the study will be assigned to a technology-assisted instruction group and a traditional instruction group using a pre-prepared randomization checklist.

Interventions

OTHERTechnology-assisted teaching group

Participants in the technology-assisted teaching group will receive an 8-week technology-assisted.

Participants in the traditional teaching group will receive ethics training using an 8-week traditional teaching method developed by the researchers.

Sponsors

Istanbul Aydın University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Group 1: technology-assisted teaching group Group 2: traditional teaching group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Being 18 years of age or older Being a second-year nursing student Using a smartphone Not having received prior nursing ethics training Voluntary participation in the research.

Exclusion criteria

Being a first, third, or fourth-year nursing student. Having received prior training in nursing ethics. Not using a smartphone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ethical Dilemma Test in NursingBaselineThe Nursing Dilemma Test (NDT) was developed by Crisham (1981) and its validity and reliability in Turkish were tested by Cerit (2010). Responses to the scale are evaluated using a Likert-type scale, yielding scores for "Principle Thinking (PT)," "Practical Thinking (PT)," and "Familiarity (A)." Principle thinking reflects how much importance nurses place on ethical principles when making ethical decisions. The range of PT scores is between 18 and 66. Practical thinking measures the importance nurses give to environmental factors in ethical issues. The range of PT scores is between 6 and 36. In the familiarity section, scores between 6 and 17 indicate familiarity with a similar situation, while scores between 18 and 30 indicate unfamiliarity.
Moral sensitivity scaleBaselineThe Turkish validity and reliability of the scale developed by Lutzen et al. (2017) was developed by Tosun (2018). This scale has 30 items and six sub-dimensions. The sub-dimensions are: holistic approach, implementation, autonomy, conflict, beneficence, and orientation. Participants used a seven-point rating scale next to each item, assigning a value between 1 (strongly agree) and 7 (strongly disagree). The total score ranges from 30 to 210, with the level of ethical sensitivity decreasing as the score increases.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTCennet ÇİRİŞ YILDIZ, Associate professor
cennetcirisyildiz@aydin.edu.tr+904441428

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026