Skip to content

Effect of Intraluminal Administration of Menthol Solution During Colonoscopy on Colonic Spasm and Adenoma Detection Rate

Effect of Intraluminal Administration of Menthol Solution During Colonoscopy on Colonic Spasm and Adenoma Detection Rate: An Efficacy and Safety Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07501962
Enrollment
440
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy

Brief summary

In recent years, with increasing research into antispasmodic agents, topical antispasmodics have attracted considerable attention due to their direct action on the gastrointestinal mucosa and relatively low incidence of adverse reactions. Menthol, a natural terpenoid compound found in peppermint oil, has been confirmed by numerous studies to possess spasmolytic properties. Existing evidence indicates that menthol relaxes intestinal smooth muscle and alleviates spasm symptoms by antagonizing L-type calcium channels on the smooth muscle cell membrane, thereby reducing calcium influx. Furthermore, it exhibits local analgesic effects and can attenuate visceral hypersensitivity. Some studies suggest that oral or topical administration of peppermint oil preparations may improve intestinal spasm during colonoscopy, highlighting its potential utility in digestive endoscopy procedures. Nevertheless, current research on the spasmolytic efficacy and safety of menthol solution when administered via endoscopic irrigation during colonoscopy remains limited, and high-quality clinical trials are urgently needed for validation. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of menthol solution in relieving intestinal spasm, thereby providing scientific evidence for optimizing colonoscopy procedures.

Interventions

DRUGEndoscopic irrigation was performed using a 0.1% menthol solution combined with simethicone.

Preparation method: Normal saline was used as the solvent. Menthol cyclodextrin inclusion complex (containing 7.3% menthol) was accurately weighed at 6.85 g and dissolved in 500 ml of normal saline to prepare a 0.1% menthol solution. After complete dissolution, 5 g of simethicone was added to form an aqueous suspension.

DRUGEndoscopic irrigation was performed using an aqueous suspension prepared with simethicone and normal saline.

Preparation method: 5 g of simethicone was added to 500 ml of normal saline to form the aqueous suspension.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18 and 75 years, regardless of gender; 2. Scheduled to undergo colonoscopy (for screening, diagnostic, or follow-up purposes); 3. Adequate bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score ≥ 6); 4. Voluntarily signed informed consent and able to cooperate with completing study-related assessments.

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to menthol, cyclodextrin, or related substances; 2. History of severe intestinal diseases (such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, intestinal perforation, intestinal obstruction, intestinal tumors, etc.); 3. Presence of severe dysfunction of vital organs such as the heart, liver, kidneys, or lungs, or coagulation disorders; 4. Pregnant or lactating women; 5. Use of anticholinergic drugs, calcium channel blockers, or other spasmolytic agents within one week prior to the examination; 6. Psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment that prevent cooperation with the study; 7. History of contraindications to colonoscopy or serious adverse reactions during previous procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of intestinal spasmDay 0Intestinal spasm score: Score 1 (Excellent): No spasm; the lumen opening is greater than or equal to two-thirds of the maximum diameter. Score 2 (Moderate): Moderate spasm; the lumen opening is less than two-thirds of the maximum diameter. Score 3 (Poor): Severe spasm; the oral-side lumen cannot be visualized. The maximum diameter is defined as the diameter of the intestinal lumen when fully distended. Spasm incidence: The percentage of patients with an intestinal spasm score of 2 or 3 out of the total number of patients in the group.
adenoma detection rate (ADR)Day 0ADR = (Number of patients with at least one adenomatous polyp detected / Total number of patients in the group) × 100%. Pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spasm inhibition rateDay 0The percentage of patients whose lumen opening exceeded two-thirds of the maximum diameter within 30 seconds after water injection irrigation, relative to the total number of patients in the group.
Polyp detection rate (PDR)Day 0PDR = (Number of patients with at least one polyp detected / Total number of patients in the group) × 100%.

Contacts

CONTACTJianning Yao
rjyy@zzu.edu.cn13733183434

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026